Comparative Research Of The Elderly Physique In Wuhan Based On The National Physique Monitoring And Testing

With the sharp decline in fertility levels, population structure reverse to climb, gradually increase the degree of population aging, shrinking family size, to the end of 2015, Hubei province aged 60 and older population will reach 10.424 million,17.6% of the total population, the aging aging brings risk is increasing, the whole society will face a series of new challenges such as social welfare, health insurance, economic, cultural and other aspects of the physical health of older persons will directly affect the life quality of life of older persons, but also academics, social and national attention problems.In Hubei Province, the second and third national physique monitoring of elderly people in Wuhan as an object, in accordance with standards established by the State Sports General Administration, the use of literature, research methods of mathematical statistics and logical analysis of the 2005 and 2010 National Physical Fitness Test Wuhan, Hubei province elderly test data area 60 to 69 age group comparative analysis, research in 2005 and 2010 changes of the Constitution of the elderly in Wuhan, and Wuhan physical condition and characteristics of the elderly, aimed at understanding 2005-2010 Wuhan elderly Physique and physical changes in the situation, to improve the physical health of the elderly rationalization proposals.The results showed that:1, the body shape;In group of 65-69, male rural elderly aged 60～64 in 2005 is higher than 2010,and has a significant difference (P<0.05), in 2005,male rural elderly weight is more than 2010 and there is a significant difference in group of 65-69(P<0.01). in group of 65-69, women older hips in 2005 is less than in 2010 and has a significant difference (P<0.05), the rural elderly female hips in 2005 less than in 2010 and has a significant difference (P<0.01).2, the body functions:Male, female elderly in two age groups between urban and rural resting pulse 2005 annual average higher than in 2010 and both has a significant differences(P<0.01). Vital capacity of Urban female elderly of 2005 is less than2010 and has a significant difference (P<0.05).3, physical fitness:Female elderly, female urban elderly, rural elderly women grip strength of 2005 are greater than 2010 and has a significant difference (respectively, P <0.01, P<0.05, P<0.01). rural elderly men, rural elderly women aged 60-64 whose sit and reach length of 2005 is longer than 2010 and has a significant difference (P<0.05).4. Derived index:the elderly men "BM, Waist chest ratio, WHR, FVC ratio" of 2005 are greater than 2010 and has a significant difference (P<0.05) in the 65-69 age group. Urban elderly male FVC ratio, total body fat and of 2005 is less than 2010 and has a significant difference, while men rural elderly of 2005 are lager than 2010 and has a significant difference. Rural elderly female WHR of 2005 is more than in 2010 and has a significant difference (P<0.01) in the 65-69 age group. Urban elderly women waist chest, waist-hip ratio in 2005 is greater than 2010, FVC ratio, total body fat summation less than 2010 in 2005 and has a significant difference.Conclusions:1, In 2005, older body shape does not occur significantly changed as age increasing, and vital capacity, grip strength, choice reaction time and FVC ratio, Waist chest ratio,the women WHR has a significant change with age increasing,and the whole show the physical level is higher than the rural elderly senior citizen.2, In 2010, older body shape does not occur significantly changed as age increasing, the elderly vital capacity, grip strength of men, and women choice reaction time occurs significantly changed as age increasing. The whole show physical level is higher than the rural elderly senior citizen.3, Comparing to 2005, the elderly body shape of 2010 is smaller,the rural elderly men of 2010 has small size, and the performance in 2010 of the elderly in general for rural elderly height, weight, measurements, grip strength, reaction time, standing on one leg with closed eyes and other indicators is more than 2005, while the urban elderly in 2005 and 2010 dose not has too much difference. Compared to 2005, resting heart rate general decline in 2010,however vital capacity increased. BM, WHR, Waist chest ratio and the other indicators is less than 2005.Meanwhile the differences between urban and rural areas increased.