| Purpose:The changes of Webster,ADL,and UPDRS scores before and after treatment were observed in the treatment group and control group.Statistical analysis was performed on the corresponding indicators before and after treatment in the two groups.The differences in efficacy between the two treatment methods in improving the quality of life of VPS patients were explored.Method:According to the principle of randomized control,60 VPS patients meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into a treatment group of 30 patients and a control group of 30 patients.Between the ages of 56 and 81 years old,the average age of the treatment group was 67.6±7.51 years,and the mean age of the control group was 66.8±8.23 years.Both groups added different acupuncture methods on the basis of routine medical treatment of blood circulation and blood circulation and improved blood circulation.Acupoints in the treatment group:Fengchi,Sun,Baihui,Sishencong,Hegu,Taichong,Yanglingquan,with points for addition and subtraction with the card,the wind pool and the temple are connected with the electric needle,the temple is connected with the negative pole,and the wind pool point is connected with the positive pole.The use of density waves,the frequency of patient tolerance for the degree;acupoints in the control group:wind pool,Baihui,Sishencong,Hegu,Taichong,Yanglingquan,with points add or subtract with the card.Once a day,rest on Sunday for 1 day and 30 days for 1 course of treatment.Two groups of Webster,ADL and UPDRS scores were recorded before treatment.The scores of the two groups were recorded again after the end of the treatment.Changes in scores before and after treatment were compared and statistical analysis was performed.Result:(1)After the treatment,the effective rate of the two groups was 20.0%in the treatment group and 3.3%in the control group.The significant rate in the treatment group was higher than that in the control group(p<0.05);(2)After treatment,the two groups Comparing the total effective rate,the total effective rate was 93.3%in the treatment group and 73.3%in the control group.The total effective rate in the treatment group was higher than that in the control group(p<0.05);(3)Comparison between the two improved Webster scores after treatment The treatment group was superior to the control group(p<0.05);(4)The improved ADL scores after treatment were better in the treatment group than in the control group(p<0.05);(5)Comparison of improved UPDRS scores between the two groups after treatment The group was superior to the control group(p<0.05).Conclusion:(1)Electroacupuncture at Sun and Fengchi has good clinical efficacy in the treatment of vascular Parkinsonism.(2)Electroacupuncture at Sun and Fengchi treatment of vascular parkinsonism can significantly improve patients’ Webster,ADL and UPDRS scores,and the effect is better than traditional acupuncture control group.(3)The electroacupuncture of Temple and Fengchi is more effective than traditional acupuncture control in the treatment of vascular Parkinsonism.(4)Electro-acupuncture sun and wind pool treatment of vascular Parkinson’s syndrome is worthy of clinical promotion. |