Construction Of The Evaluation Index System Of Standardized Training Effect For New Nurses Based On CIPP Model And Kirkpatrick Model

[Objective]This study aims to establish a scientific,comprehensive and highly operable evaluation index system for the effect of standardized training for new nurses,provide theoretical basis for the effect evaluation of standardized training for new nurses,and promote the continuous improvement of the quality of standardized training for new nurses.[Methods]Based on CIPP model and Kirkpatrick model,we searched and read relevant literatures and materials on evaluation of training effect of new nurses,and extracted evaluation indexes of standardized training effect of new nurses.Objective sampling method was adopted to select the nursing managers,clinical nursing experts and standardized training nurses as the semi-structured interview subjects.According to the interview purpose,on the basis of previous literature research and theoretical analysis,the interview outline was developed for different interviewees.Colaizzi’s seven-step analysis of phenomenological data was used to analyze the data.Combined with the results of qualitative interviews,the indicators were verified and supplemented.We choosed 20 nursing management experts,clinical nursing experts and nursing education experts to issue enquiry for questionnaire in Nanjing.The aim is to further define the concept of the institute,to formulate new nurse standardized training effect evaluation indexes for further screening and argument further for the assement method of the indexes.On the basis of the result of expert consultation,the analytic hierarchy process was used to set the index weight.All data analysis can be completed by Excel and SPSS statistical software.[Results]This study constructed the standardized training effect evaluation index system for new nurses.The index system includes 4 first-level indicators,12 second-level indicators and 53 third-level indicators.The recovery rates were both 100%.The proposed rate was 73.68%and 21.05%,with a high degree of participation and enthusiasm of experts.The authority coefficients of the two rounds were 0.825 and 0.845,both greater than 0.70.The consulting results are reliable and highly authoritative.The included index variation coefficient was all less than 0.3,and the two rounds of Kendall coordination coefficient were 0.254 and 0.319,P<0.01,indicating that the evaluation results of the indicators at all levels were gradually consistent among experts,and there was no big difference in the evaluation of the indicators.CR values of all indexes were<0.1,indicates that the weight distribution of each index was reasonable.Among the first-level indicators,the process evaluation(0.391)and background evaluation(0.276)rank the first.Among the secondary indicators,the training objectives(0.493),training programs(0.559),knowledge and skills(0.393)and personal professional development(0.667)rank the top in terms of weight value.Among the three-level indicators,the most important ones are post demand(0.750),specialty training target(0.493),system guarantee(0.614),and rotation departments(0.547).There are differences in the assessment personnel and assessment methods of indicators at different levels,and a relatively clear and focused assessment method of indicators has been formed through research.[Conclusion]This study established new nurse standardized training effect evaluation index system by the scientific and precise method,formed the supervision pattern of training effects provided referential basis for the evaluation and assessment,laid a foundation for optimizing the new nurse training program and continuously improving training quality.However,it still needs to be further tested in future practice for its scientificity and operability.