| Objective:To observe the changes of hemodynamics and SmtO2 after the establishment of CO2 pneumoperitoneum during general anesthesia and the relationship between them.Method:Patients who met the requirements of the test were selected.The patients were admitted to the operating room,and HR,NBP,SpO2,Temp and BIS were routinely monitored.Non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring was performed by LiDCOrapid.If the patient complained of tension,anxiety or vital signs such as heart rate and blood pressure were 20%higher than the basic ward value,propofol 10-30mg were given intravenously.Anesthesia induction with 6 L/min pure oxygen to give oxygen to nitrogen,in turn,intravenous propofol 2 mg/kg,cisatracurium 0.2 mg/kg,sufentanial 0.3μg/kg,the rapid induction,endotracheal intubation technique,connected breathing machine,by adjusting the parameters of the breathing machine,capacity control of mechanical ventilation mode,set up 1:1 mixed air oxygen inhaled,fresh gas flow 2 L/min,tidal volume for 68 mL/kg,breathing rate1020 times/min,the absorption/exhalation ratio is 1:1.52,maintain PETCO2in 3545 mmHg.Propofol 410mg·kg-1·h-1 combined with continuous intravenous infusion of remifentanil 0.010.03ug·kg-1·min-1,BIS value 4065was maintained.Maintain Temp3637.5℃.Cisatracurium were given to maintain muscle relax.Dizocine were given intravenously for postoperative analgesia.All patients were sent to PACU after surgery.Intraoperative CO2pneumoperitoneum pressure was 12mmHg.The general information of patients(age,height,weight,ASA grading,hemoglobin),continuous pneumoperitoneum time were recorded.And the values of CO,CI,SV,SVR,MAP and brachioradialis muscle SmtO2 were recorded at resting state before anesthesia induction(T0),5min before pneumoperitoneum(T1),pneumoperitoneum(T2),5min(T3)and 10 min(T4)after pneumoperitoneum,deflating pneumoperitoneum(T5)and 5min after deflating CO2 pneumoperitoneum(T6).Results:1.Influence of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamic indexesCompared with T0,HR,CO,CI,SV and MAP decreased at T1(P<0.05),while SVR showed no significant difference(P>0.05).At T2 and T3,HR,CO,CI,MAP and SV decreased,while SVR increased(P<0.05).At T4,HR,CO,CI and MAP decreased,SVR increased(P<0.05),and SV difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).At T5 and T6,HR and MAP decreased(P<0.05),while SV,SVR,CO and CI showed no significant difference(P>0.05).Compared with T1,at T2,CO,CI and SV decreased,SVR increased(P<0.05),while HR and MAP showed no significant difference(P>0.05).At T3,SV decreased and SVR increased(P<0.05),but the differences in CO,CI,MAP and HR were not statistically significant(P>0.05).At T4,SVR and MAP increased(P<0.05),while CO,CI,SV and HR showed no significant difference(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in CO,CI,SV,SVR and MAP(P>0.05).At T6,CO and CI decreased and HR increased(P<0.05),while SV,SVR and MAP showed no significant difference(P>0.05).Compared with T2,HR and MAP increased at T3(P<0.05),while CO,CI,SV and SVR showed no significant difference(P>0.05).At T4,HR and MAP increased,while CO and CI decreased(P<0.05),while SV and SVR showed no significant difference(P>0.05).At T5 and T6,HR and SV increased,CO,CI and SVR decreased(P<0.05),and MAP showed no significant difference(P>0.05).Compared with T3,CO and CI increased at T4(P<0.05),while HR,SV,SVR and MAP showed no significant difference(P>0.05).At T5 and T6,CO,CI,HR and SV increased,while SVR and MAP decreased(P<0.05).When compared with T4,HR increased at T5 and T6,SVR and MAP decreased(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference in CO,CI and SV(P>0.05).Compared with T5,HR,CO,CI,SV,SVR and MAP at T6 showed no significant difference(P>0.05).See Table 2.2.Effect of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on brachioradialis muscle SmtO2Compared with T0,SmtO2 decreased at T2,T3,T4 and T5(P<0.05),there was no significant difference in SmtO2 level at T1 and T6(P>0.05).Compared with T1,SmtO2 decreased at T3 and T4(P<0.05),while there was no significant difference in SmtO2 at T2,T5 and T6(P>0.05).Compared with T2,SmtO2 decreased at T3 and T4,(P<0.05);while there was no significant difference in SmtO2 at T5 and T6,(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in SmtO2 at T3,T4,T5 and T6,and no significant difference in pairwise comparison(P>0.05).See Table 3.3.Relationship between hemodynamics and brachioradialis muscle SmtO2There was a low positive correlation between HR,CO,CI and SmtO2(r=0.257,0.212,0.202,P<0.05,respectively).There was a low negative correlation between SVR and SmtO2(r=-0.165,P<0.05).As shown in Table 3.4.Effects of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on brachioradialis muscle SmtO2 in different hemoglobin populationsAnemia was determined according to whether the Hb was higher than110g/L.Among the 39 patients,28 were normal and 11 were anaemic.There were no significant differences in general condition indexes between the normal group and the anemia group(P>0.05),as shown in Table 4.There was no significant difference in brachioradialis muscle SmtO2 level between the normal group and the anemia group at each time point(P>0.05).In the normal hemoglobin group,SmtO2 changes were significantly different at different times of pneumoperitoneum establishment(P<0.05),and SmtO2 level reached the lowest value at T4.There were no significant differences in brachioradialis muscle SmtO2 before and after the establishment of pneumoperitoneum in the anemia group(P<0.05),as shown in Table 5.Conclusion:1.General anesthesia and laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum establishment have an impact on non-invasive hemodynamic parameters under LiDCOrapid monitoring.2.CO2 pneumoperitoneum under general anesthesia is the main factor causing the decline of brachioradialis SmtO2.3.Brachioradialis SmtO2 was positively correlated with changes in HR,CO and CI;It is negatively correlated with SVR change.4.The effect of CO2 pneumoperitoneum under general anesthesia on the brachioradialis SmtO2 in normal hemoglobin population and anemia population is different. |