Minimum Subsistence And Anti-poverty In Urban And Rural Areas

Our country has entered a new era.The main contradiction in the current society has transformed into a contradiction between the people's growing good living needs and unbalanced and inadequate development.Over the past four decades of reform and opening up,the overall level of productivity in our country has significantly increased,but the status of unbalanced development has not changed fundamentally.The problem of inadequate development imbalance is largely caused by poverty and it is basically feasible by people.The good life of the people needs to include not only material needs,but also spiritual needs such as a sense of well-being,happiness,security,dignity,and rights,including satisfactory income,stable work,quality education,reliable social security,and superior Medical,comfortable accommodation,etc.Amartya Sen also pointed out that income is not the only measure of poverty,and that deprivation of ability is the root cause of poverty.Therefore,multidimensional poverty is the mainstream of social poverty research today.China is an active advocate and powerful promoter of the cause of poverty alleviation in the world.Guterres,the UN Secretary-General,praised China's achievements in poverty reduction and stated that during the past decade,China has made the greatest contribution to global poverty reduction.China has made decisive progress in its fight against poverty,with more than 60 million impoverished people achieving stable poverty alleviation,and the incidence of poverty has dropped from 10.2%to below 4%.As a kind of public transfer payment in our country,the minimum living security system is the case.How was the minimum living security system in China operating at that time?How are the poverty conditions of urban and rural residents in China?What is the impact of the minimum living security system on multidimensional poverty in urban and rural areas in China?In this paper,by studying the data from the China Family Tracking Survey(CFPS)in 2010,2012,and 2014,we use the A-F Multidimensional Poverty Measurement Method and the Multidimensional Poverty Index MPI and the Multidimensional Inequality Index CSPI to measure the urban and rural multidimensional poverty conditions in China.Among them,according to the standards of the United Nations Development Programmer,recommendations of Rippin(2015)and the experience of most scholars in the academic community,the seven indicators of income,health,education,employment,housing,and future confidence are selected to judge the seven dimensions;Defining the deprivation threshold using both the absolute threshold and the relative threshold.To measure the multidimensional poverty in urban and rural areas in China according to the single dimensions,multi-dimensions and different levels of poverty,analyze the urban and rural poverty incidence rate,poverty intensity,poverty level,and its change trend;at the same time,according to different poverty levels,the poverty rate is calculated through decomposition.Different poverty levels have different contributions to urban and rural areas,and they are tailored to the needs of different households.Finally,they study the impact of low-income insurance on the multi-dimensional poverty in urban and rural areas in China,and propose solutions and suggestions for them.As the measurement study finds:Education and employment in our country are more important social issues.Rural poverty and education dimensions should pay attention to poverty.At the same time,we must pay attention to severe poverty and poverty.We must pay attention to employment and housing dimensions of urban poverty,and focus on mild poverty and poverty.The poverty situation in China is mainly affected by the level of poverty and the level of severe poverty.The rural communities have experienced greater poverty intensity,higher levels of poverty,and greater inequality.The contribution rate of different levels of poverty in rural areas is larger than that of cities,and poverty in rural areas will directly affect the entire country.Through the empirical analysis of the propensity value matching method(PSM),it has been found that the low-income guarantee increases urban-rural unilateral poverty and multidimensional poverty,and does not play a role in poverty reduction for the life of urban and rural residents;and compared with rural areas,subsistence allowance makes urban residents Being even poorer means that the implementation of Di Bao in urban areas is even less satisfactory.In order to achieve the goal of reducing poverty,China must strive to identify the"roots",apply the right medicine,and implement accurate poverty alleviation.Establish multidimensional precision classification assistance,implement accurate and comprehensive.assistance for special groups,overcome vulnerabilities in precision and fair assistance,establish a unified dynamic and low-income adjustment mechanism,establish an integrated information system for urban and rural areas,raise the level of assistance,and improve the public participation system.Always adhere to reform and opening up,adhere to the government-led approach,adhere to the development-oriented approach to poverty alleviation,persist in mobilizing the participation of the whole society,and adhere to the combination of inclusive policies and preferential policies to reduce poverty along with Chinese characteristics.