An Analysis Of The Social Impact Of The Critical Views Of The Emperor's Calligraphy

In ancient Chinese society,as an individual of calligraphy criticism,the emperor’s criticism not only has a unique standpoint,but also has an impact on society.However,there are differences in the social impact of imperial calligraphy criticism.In a specific historical period,imperial calligraphy criticism can have a wide and profound social impact,which ultimately leads to the change of social standards of calligraphy evaluation;in a specific historical period,imperial calligraphy criticism can not form a broad impact in society,and ultimately can not really lead to social dominance.The standard of calligraphy evaluation.In view of this,this paper chooses three emperors in the history of calligraphy,Taizong of Tang Dynasty,Gaozong of Song Dynasty and Saint-ancestor of Qing Dynasty as the discussion center,hoping to explore the social influence of which factors restrict the views of the emperor’s calligraphy criticism through analysis and comparison.In the specific analysis,it focuses on three links: the imperial calligraphy criticism,the way that the imperial calligraphy criticism affects the society,and the social calligraphy acceptance.In addition,through the analysis of the social impact of the imperial calligraphy criticism,and then reflection,the individual calligraphy criticism into a social standard of calligraphy evaluation needs the conditions.