Effect of Agricultural Land use Changes on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Carbon Dynamics in Drained Peat Soils in the San Joaquin Delta, CA | | Posted on:2013-10-18 | Degree:M.S | Type:Thesis | | University:University of California, Davis | Candidate:Assa, Yacov | Full Text:PDF | | GTID:2451390008485282 | Subject:Biogeochemistry | | Abstract/Summary: | PDF Full Text Request | | Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) from two cropping systems on Twitchell Island was monitored spring 2010 to spring 2012 in the San Joaquin-Sacramento Delta in California (herein the "Delta"). The cropping systems under study were field corn and Delta rice. The project was set to study the effects of the cropping system on GHG emissions and soil organic carbon (SOC). Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4) and Nitrous Oxide (N 2O) emissions measurement was done every one to three weeks during spring 2010–2012. Crop final biomass and total carbon (C) was measured for residue and C input estimation each year. In addition, the effect of crop residue levels on GHG emissions and C dynamics was studied over one year in each system during 2010–2011. The main objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that conversion of subsided agricultural peat land from the current corn system to Delta rice would reduce overall GHG emissions, mainly CO2and N2O. It was hypothesized that the increase in CH4emissions due to the flooding conditions would be insignificant relative to total reduction in CO2emissions.;The Delta rice CH4cumulative emissions differed between the two years of study (212 and 39 kg CH4-C/ha for the 2010–2011 and 2011–2012 year, respectively). The reduction in 2011–2012 vs. 2010–2011 CH4emissions was likely due to the placement of rice residue 20-30cm below soil surface when the field was moldboard plowed in spring 2011 and the shorter flooding period during the 2011 rice growing season (108 vs. 82 days in 2010 and 2011, respectively). In an experiment to determine the effects of various levels of rice residue on CO2and CH4emissions, CH4emissions from plots receiving rice residues averaged as much as 3 times higher than plots with no residue, while CO2emissions were not affected. During both years, a significant percentage of the CH4was emitted during the winter field drain in preparation for spring planting (63% and 53% in 2010–2011 and 2011–2012 respectively). Total CO2emissions in the rice system averaged slightly lower during 2010–2011 than in 2011–2012 (8044kg CO2-C vs. 9860kg CO2-C/ha), respectively with over 70% of the emissions occurring when the field was not flooded. These figures are likely an overestimation. Total N2O emissions were higher in the rice system during 2010–2011 than 2011–2012 (11 kg N2O-N/ha and 6 kg N2O-N/ha in 2010–2011 and 2011–2012 respectively). All GHG emissions were related to flooding regime and soil water status, and were highest after the winter drain and during the period of field operations to summer flood for rice growing.;In the corn system, total CO2emissions were similar in 2011–2012 and 2010–2011 (8845 and 8405 kg CO2-C/ha respectively) with about 60% of it occurring during the corn growing period. N2O emissions averaged higher in the 2nd year of the study (8.9 vs. 12.6 kg N2O-N/ha in the 2010–2011 and 2011–2012 periods, respectively). N2O emissions from the corn system were also affected by soil water status, and were highest in the spring during a period of drop in water table levels. Residue level did not affect CO2or N 2O emissions in the cornfield. Total estimated residue carbon input from both systems was similar in 2011 but was higher in the corn system in 2010. In 2011 the corn residue was baled and removed, which left an estimated 1 ton C/ha from residue input.;Both systems are a net source of GHG. A significant portion of the rice GHG emissions occurred during the fallow period and when the rice was planted but not flooded (i.e. pre-flood and drain process). In the corn system, GHG emissions occurred during the summer (CO2) and spring (N2 O). Rice total GHG emissions (in CO2equivalents) were higher in 2010–2011 but not significantly different in 2011–2012 than the corn system. Although the rice did not significantly reduce CO2emissions, while increasing CH4, it offers a system with more room for management improvements for GHG and subsidence mitigation.;N2O emissions consisted of 50% to 75% of the annual GWP in CO2equivalents in the two years (excluding CO2emissions) in the rice system. A management practice that reduces N2O emissions would greatly reduce the total GHG. (Abstract shortened by UMI.). | | Keywords/Search Tags: | Emissions, GHG, System, Rice, Delta, Total, Carbon, Spring | PDF Full Text Request | Related items |
| |
|