| Purpose: To observe the clinical effect of Qingre Huoxue Tongqiao method on patients with chronic simple rhinitis and its influence on nasal ventilation volume.Materials and methods: from August 2018 to November 2019,80 patients with chronic simple rhinitis with lung meridian heat accumulation syndrome were selected from the outpatient department of Otorhinolaryngology,Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of traditional Chinese medicine.The patients were randomly divided into control group(n=40)and treatment group(n = 40).The control group took Tongqiao Biyan tablets for 1 month,while the treatment group took Bishu mixture(hospital preparation in Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of traditional Chinese Medicine)for 1 month.Nasal endoscopy,nasal resistance test,symptom score table,physical sign score table,visual analogue scale(subjective VAS score of nasal ventilation volume)and short form of Health Survey(SF-36) were performed respectively at the time of treatment and 1 month of treatment.The results before and after treatment were summarized,the changes were compared,and the treatment effect was evaluated,and the improvement of nasal ventilation volume before and after treatment was evaluated Change.result:1.There was no significant difference in age,gender,course of disease,symptom score,sign score,VAS score,SF-36 score and nasal resistance measurement data between the two groups before treatment(P > 0.05).2.Symptoms,signs and general situation: the sign score,symptom score and total score of the control group and the treatment group after 1 month treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment,with statistical difference(P < 0.05).The sign score,symptom score and total score of the treatment group were significantly lower than those of the control group(P < 0.05).3.Efficacy evaluation: after 1 month of treatment,the total effective rate of the treatment group was 85%,and that of the control group was 62.5%.The total effective rate of the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group,with statistical difference(P < 0.05).4.Quality of life assessment: after one month of treatment,the scores of general health status,social function and mental health in the SF-36 scale of the control group and the treatment group had no significant changes compared with those before treatment(P > 0.05).The scores of physiological function,physiological function,physical pain,energy and emotional function in SF-36 scale of the two groups after 1 month of treatment were significantly improved,with statistical difference The scores of physiological function,physiological function,physical pain,energy and emotional function in the treatment group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P < 0.05).5.Changes of nasal ventilation volume: the VAS scores of subjective nasal ventilation volume in the control group and the treatment group after 1 month treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment,with statistical difference(P < 0.05).The VAS score of subjective nasal ventilation volume in the treatment group was significantly lower than that in the control group,with statistical difference(P < 0.05).After 1 month of treatment,the bilateral expiratory and bilateral inspiratory nasal resistance in the control group and the treatment group were significantly lower than those before treatment,with statistical difference(P < 0.05).The bilateral inspiratory nasal resistance and bilateral expiratory nasal resistance in the treatment group were significantly lower than those in the control group,with statistical difference(P<0.01).Conclusion:1.The treatment group and the control group of patients with chronic simple rhinitis symptoms and signs were improved,the treatment group was better than the control group.2.The treatment group can significantly improve the SF-36 scale physiological function,physiological function,physical pain,energy and emotional function score,improve the patients’ physiological and mental health status.3.The treatment group can significantly reduce the subjective VAS score of nasal ventilation volume and improve the symptoms of nasal congestion.4.The treatment group can significantly reduce nasal ventilation resistance and increase nasal ventilation volume.5.The overall curative effect of the treatment group was better than that of the control group. |
PDF Full Text Request