Font Size: a A A

Clinical Observation Of Duhuo Jisheng Decoction Combined With Huangdi Nei Acupuncture In The Treatment Of Liver And Kidney Yin Deficiency Type Osteoporosis

Posted on:2024-01-12Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:F J FanFull Text:PDF
GTID:2544306938962369Subject:Fractures of TCM science
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective:thesis research mainly studies the clinical observation of Duhuo Jisheng Decoction combined with Huangdi Nei-acupuncture in the treatment of liver and kidney Yin deficiency type osteoporosis,and compares the clinical effect with conventional Western anti-osteoporosis drugs,so as to provide a more optimized treatment for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis patients and improve the quality of life of patients.Methods :This topic takes patients with osteoporosis as the research object,and the selected cases were all from patients who took Chinese medicine and acupuncture in the outpatient department of Liu Zhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine.Sixty eligible patients were included and randomized control was carried out,among which 30 patients were instructed to take western medicine as the control group.The other group of 30 patients were treated with internal acupuncture and taking traditional Chinese medicine on the basis of the control group.The basic data of the patients,including gender,age,duration of disease and follow-up time,were recorded respectively.VAS score,Oswestry Disability Index(ODI)score and TCM symptom score were evaluated before treatment,1 day,7 days and 10 days,respectively.Statistical SPSS26.0 was used to analyze the above results.Results:1.General data: the general data of the two groups of patients have some differences,according to the statistical analysis prompts(P > 0.05)to state that the two groups of data are comparable.2.VAS score:(1)before treatment,the VAS score was 6.00(5.00,6.00)in the treatment group,5.00(4.75,6.00)in the control group,and the data of the two groups did not present a comparative value(P > 0.05).(2)After 1 day of treatment,the VAS score was 5.00(4.00,5.00)in the control group and4.00(4.00,5.00)in the treatment group,which was suggested by statistical analysis that the difference between the two groups was insignificant(P >0.05).(3)After 7 days of treatment,the VAS score was 4.00(3.00,4.00)in the control group and 2.00(2.00,3.00)in the treatment group,and statistical analysis showed that there was significant meaning in difference between groups(P < 0.05).(4)After the treatment for 10 days,the VAS score was3.00(3.00,3.00)in the control group and 1.00(1.00,1.00)in the treatment group.According to the statistical analysis results,the difference between groups is statistically significant(P < 0.05).3.ODI score:(1)Pretherapy score,the treatment group had an ODI score of 36.00(35.00,37.00),the control group had an ODI score of 36.00(35.00,37.00),and the data of the two groups did not present the value of comparison(P > 0.05).(2)On day 1 of treatment,the ODI rating score of the control members was 30.00(30.00,32.00),and the ODI rating score of the treatment group was 28.00(26.75,30.00),which was suggested to be significantly different between groups by statistical analysis(P < 0.05).(3)At 7 days of treatment,the ODI rating score of the control members was 25.00(21.00,25.00),and the ODI rating score of the treatment group was 15.00(15.00,18.00)with statistical analysis suggesting a statistically significant difference between the groups(P<0.05).(4)On 10 days of treatment,the ODI rating score of the control members was 20.00(16.00,20.21.General data: the general data of the two groups of patients have some differences,according to the statistical analysis prompts(P > 0.05)to state that the two groups of data are comparable.2.VAS score:(1)before treatment,the VAS score was 6.00(5.00,6.00)in the treatment group,5.00(4.75,6.00)in the control group,and the data of the two groups did not present a comparative value(P > 0.05).(2)After 1 day of treatment,the VAS score was 5.00(4.00,5.00)in the control group and4.00(4.00,5.00)in the treatment group,which was suggested by statistical analysis that the difference between the two groups was insignificant(P >0.05).(3)After 7 days of treatment,the VAS score was 4.00(3.00,4.00)in the control group and 2.00(2.00,3.00)in the treatment group,and statistical analysis showed that there was significant meaning in difference between groups(P < 0.05).(4)After the treatment for 10 days,the VAS score was3.00(3.00,3.00)in the control group and 1.00(1.00,1.00)in the treatment group.According to the statistical analysis results,the difference between groups is statistically significant(P < 0.05).3.ODI score:(1)Pretherapy score,the treatment group had an ODI score of 36.00(35.00,37.00),the control group had an ODI score of 36.00(35.00,37.00),and the data of the two groups did not present the value of comparison(P > 0.05).(2)On day 1 of treatment,the ODI rating score of the control members was 30.00(30.00,32.00),and the ODI rating score of the treatment group was 28.00(26.75,30.00),which was suggested to be significantly different between groups by statistical analysis(P < 0.05).(3)At 7 days of treatment,the ODI rating score of the control members was 25.00(21.00,25.00),and the ODI rating score of the treatment group was 15.00(15.00,18.00)with statistical analysis suggesting a statistically significant difference between the groups(P<0.05).(4)On 10 days of treatment,the ODI rating score of the control members was 20.00(16.00,20.2).4.TCM syndrome score:(1)Before treatment: the rating marks of the control members was 30.00(28.00,32.00),the score was 30.00(30.00,32.00)in the treatment group,and there was no comparative value between the two groups of data(P > 0.05).(2)At 1 day of treatment,the rating marks of the control members was 26.50(24.75,28.00),the score was 25.00(24.00,26.00)in the treatment group.There was no statistical meaning as the result of analyzing between the two groups(P > 0.05),according to the statistical test.(3)After the 7 days of treatment,the rating marks of the control members was20.00(20.00,22.25),and the score was 15.00(10.00,18.00)in the treatment group,and two groups with significant difference in statistics.(P < 0.05).(4)Ten days of treatment,the value of the score among the control members was20.00(15.00,22.25),and the rating marks was 2.00(1.00,5.00)among the treatment group.The difference was compared between these two groups existence statistics significant.(P < 0.05),according to the statistical test.Conclusion:1.Duhuo Jisheng Decoction combined with Huangdi Nei Acupuncture has obvious effect on patients with liver and kidney deficiency type osteoporosis(OP).2.Duhuo Jisheng Decoction combined with Huangdi Nei Needle can significantly reduce the symptoms of waist and knee tenderness,hot flusher,night sweat,fever of hands and feet,tongue red and less liver-kidney liver-kidney deficiency type OP,and significantly reduce the TCM syndrome score,which is beneficial to the rehabilitation of patients and significantly improve the function of lumbar spine.3.Duhuo Jisheng Decoction combined with Huangdi Nei Acupuncture in the treatment of liver and kidney deficiency type osteoporosis did not show significant gastrointestinal stimulation response,high safety.
Keywords/Search Tags:Duhuashi Decoction, Huangdi Neineedle, osteoporosis, deficiency of liver and kidney, pain
PDF Full Text Request
Related items