| Husserl’s creative contribution is to reveal the most surprising mystery of consciousness,and the analysis of all the "patterns of consciousness" of the objects of consciousness is one of the goals of Husserl’s philosophical work.Among all act,the most foundational act is "intuitive act".Although the analysis of "intuitive act" is only a practical example of Husserl’s conscious analysis,it is a crucial part,because the whole edifice of conscious act is built on the basis of intuitive act.Only by understanding the most primitive,simple,and foundational acts of consciousness can it be possible to understand the high-level and complex acts based on them.In particular,the relationship between perception and phantasy and their epistemological significance occupy an important position in Husserl’s philosophical research.This study studied the texts of 《phantasy,Image Consciousness,Memory》,《Logical Investigations》,《Ideen 1》,as well as the relevant domestic and foreign secondary literature on the content of "perception and phantasy",and on this basis,compared the latest achievements at home and abroad with research value.This paper analyzes Husserl’s new perspective on the relationship between perception,phantasy,memory and image consciousness,and the epistemological significance of perception and phantasy.This study attempts to make a multi-angle and systematic discussion and analysis of "the relationship between phenomenological perception and phantasy act".Through the analysis of the foundation relation in the theory of act,it can be seen that "imagination is based on perception",about which Stumpf and Brentano have made explanations.But Husserl believed that Stumpf only made explanations from the aspects of strength and perishability,and lacked phenomenological analysis.Brentano’s analysis lacks the concept of objectification.In 《 phantasy,Image Consciousness,Memory》,Husserl believes that phantasy and image consciousness both involve an image with the function of representation,so the phantasy can be included in the scope of image presentation.And since there is indeed perception in the phantasy as the content of the apprehension,just like what happens when watching the image,however,the result of the apprehension is not a kind of perception,so from the perspective of image appearance,perceptual appearance and phantasy are distinguished.Then,through the analysis of internal time consciousness,namely the distinction between primary recall and secondary recall,the essential difference between perception and phantasy is clarified.According to the above description of the characteristics of perception and imagination,the relationship between them is also reflected in epistemology.Perceptual materials can be obtained through perception.However,perception is limited to the fullfilling of individual objects,in the grasp of the general nature of the relationship between things,the actual state and so on,it is not only perception that plays a role.Here,phantasy has an absolute advantage over perception.The relationship between perception and phantasy is dialectical,they are different from each other and interrelated,the two are indispensable premise and condition of human cognition activities,in human cognition activities,perception is inseparable from phantasy,phantasy is inseparable from perception.Clarifying the relationship between them will help to establish a philosophy as a strict science,lay the foundation for science,and finally help to make science and philosophy out of crisis. |