Research On Marx’s Theory Of Division Of Labor From The Perspective Of Historical Materialism

In Marx’s entire theoretical system,the division of labor occupies a very important position.From the writing of "The Manuscript of Economics and Philosophy in 1844" to the completion of "Das Kapital",Marx never left the exploration of this theory for a long time.At the same time,the theory of division of labor is closely connected with the process of the creation and development of historical materialism.In the process of preliminary exploration,creation,maturation and application of historical materialism,the theory of division of labor has also changed from being dominated by philosophical discourse to being in the context of economics,which has experienced germination,formation,enrichment and perfection.Combing the research process of Marx’s division of labor,during the philosophy critical period,the alienation logic is transformed into production logic,corresponding is the appearance process of materialism history,the historical materialism is "Generalized historical materialism",focusing on the general rules of historical development Discussion,the division of labor corresponds to "Division of labor",manifested as social division of labor and is treated as a means;during the critical period of political economics,production logic has gradually changed to capital logic,and it corresponds to the historical history of materialism.The historical materialism is manifested."Narrow historical materialism",focused on exploration of a particular historical period,dividing the labor corresponding to the "Special",it is manifested as division of labor in the production process and is treated as a purpose.That is to say,it is not possible to view the theory and historical view of "Form",that is,it is considered to be complete after the theory is proposed.On the contrary,Marx is from the realistic research on realistic practice,constantly improved Historicalism and division of labor theory.Marx put forward the theory of division of labor,and its ultimate value orientation is for "The free and all-round development of man".Marx’s exploration of this value has gone through the transition from an abstract man to a realistic man.Real people have a dual dimension.On the one hand,real people are continuously generated with the development of history.On the other hand,real people have different specific performances in different historical stages.Therefore,based on the actual human theory,Marx further distinguished the division of labor of different nature and different forms,and clarified the dual effects that the division of labor may cause.Marx affirmed that the division of labor under certain conditions will create conditions for the free and comprehensive development of people,and at the same time promote the development,progress and change of society,but at the same time,in refuting the old-style,spontaneous and compulsory division of labor,he pointed out that if it is to be realized The ultimate goal of the free and comprehensive development of human beings must eliminate this type of division of labor and achieve a conscious and voluntary division of labor.Both Marx’s historical materialism and the theory of division of labor were put forward on the basis of exploring the contradictory movement of actual productive forces and production relations.In today’s society,productivity increases and production relations change.On the one hand,historical materialism needs to reappear in the era of artificial intelligence in the era of ossification and obsolescence.Under the general background,the division of labor has shown a new form,and the theory of division of labor itself has to reappear.Of course,as a theory with both history,reality and science,in the context of the new era,historical materialism is not only a re-appearance of the critical logic of capital,but also a re-emergence of the logic of social construction.Under the guidance of the social construction logic of historical materialism,Marx’s theory of division of labor undoubtedly has important guiding significance for the development of contemporary China.