ObjectivesTo evaluate the value of both MRI and fMRI at 3.0T in preoperative diagnosing, staging and surgical planning of rectal cancer, and to analyze the correlation of fMRI with microstructure of rectal disease.Materials and Methods1. Both MRI and fMRI were separately obtained in sixty patients with rectal diseases (38 rectal cancers, 6 local recurrence, 3 no local recurrence, 2 adenomas , 2 stromal tumors, 1 dermoid cyst, 1 endometriosis, 7 periannual abscesses and anal fistulas) by using 3.0T MR scanner (GE Signa Excite II, Milwankee, Wisconsin, U.S.A.) with a 8-channel phased-array surface coil. Bowel preparation, hypotonic study and warm sodium chloride enema were manipulated before the examination.2. Routine MRI scanning: The image quality, artifact and demonstration of rectal tumors and the wall of the rectum of 11 different sequences, including coronal T2WI(FRFSE-XL), coronal T2FS(FRFSE-XL), sagital T2WI(FRFSE-XL), sagital T2FS(FRFSE-XL), axial T2WI(FRFSE-XL), axial T2FS(FRFSE-XL), axial T1WI(FSE-XL), axial T1WI(F-SPGR), axial T1FS(F-SPGR), 2D MR hydrography(SSFSE)and contrast enhancement(3D F-SPGR), were compared. The diagnosis and staging were made according to MRI findings and were correlated with the pathologic findings. The distance from the lower margin of rectal cancer to the point where levator ani muscle attached to rectum was measured in order to...
|