A Cognitive Study Of The Scope Of Modern Chinese

It should be said, to define the scope and purpose of their research is a certain difficulty, since the purpose of the complex sentence, the purpose of the tag itself there is a lot of controversy, there are many uncertainties, the purpose of these studies is a certain category of influence. From academic research status, the research carried out for the purposes of a relatively small category, and from the perspective of the traditional interpretation of linguistics more, and "purpose" in general have a strong subjective, more suitable combination of cognitive language Studies discussed. Construction of the foundation of cognitive linguistics is human cognition, and the "purpose" also belongs to the subjectivity of human cognition, therefore, we try to apply the theory of cognitive linguistics for the purposes of this article discusses the scope of modern Chinese. The main contents include: First, the purpose of defining the scope and purpose; Second, the scope of the phenomenon object tag; Third, marked asymmetry purpose; Fourth, the purpose of unmarked form sentences; V. purpose category typical constructions; Sixth, the purpose of the three-domain complex sentences; seven Chinese and Korean purpose category comparison.Chapter One is the introduction. This chapter described the object of study and significance of the topic, summarizes the research status at home and abroad purpose category, introduced the theory and methods to be adopted, corpus source, possible innovation and the problems that may exist, it defined the scope of the study and significance.Chapter Two is to define the purpose of the category is the basis for the study after chapter. Modern Chinese purpose category "object" has the first place, predictability, virtual, intentionality, initiative, and end point of the object and other characteristics. Isolated object in cognition is there, but in the category of purpose, and the purpose is generally "act" is connected, therefore, in the context of the purpose of understanding the language of the "purpose" must be linked to related "behavior." Both interdependent and indispensable. For this purpose should be included in the category of linguistics having- a variety of grammatical units and the destination flag "purpose of the act" of the relations. Mark marker object has a function object relations is an important part of the purpose of the category, for the purposes of determining the current academic marks and some controversy, this article on the purpose of use in the context of marks to inspect and tag members of a purpose screening. In addition to the purpose of such a dominant marker signs, whether the object is also labeled forms of expression, including interlocking structure, verb-object structure and language structure and purpose of the table. Purpose and scope of the causal category, condition category has a close relationship, the purpose of the category to which they are different but intersecting, especially the purpose of the tag itself is polysemy, which makes this situation even more apparent. Our differences and connections between them are discussed after study that laid the foundation.Chapter Three before the mark on the basis of purpose were discussed. Although the purpose of having a functional marker marking object relations, but the degree of which a considerable part of the syntax of members is not too high, so their identities are often controversial. Objective To mark an object belongs to the category of the lower category, there are members in the context of typical and atypical points. We use prototype theory in cognitive linguistics for the purposes of marking members to identify, initially identified object labeled "To" is the prototype member of the category, and other objects marked as an atypical member of the object tag category. "In order to" category as the destination marker typical member of its semantic syntax has certain typical. Other members of atypical because there are some differences compared to the scope of property they have typical members, we took from the perspective of the process they enter the purpose marked areas to explore, which focuses on decategorization process, trying to cognitive and reveals the evolution of language with respect.Chapter Four discusses asymmetries within the context of the purpose. Asymmetry purpose category mainly for the purpose of marking the asymmetry and positive purpose, the purpose of negative asymmetry. Asymmetry, mainly reflected the purpose of the distribution of labeled syntactic negation and affirmation form, syntactic distribution main purpose is to guide the purpose clause marker and behavior clauses positional relationship, the main front, rear and front and rear can be three types, the majority of which were later set. Both positive and negative forms of asymmetry, mainly in individual mark on purpose, "so that" there is a corresponding negative form "avoid", "in order to" purposes but no corresponding high degree of integration of semantic markup. Objective labeled "avoid" There are affirmation and negation special phenomena confrontation disappeared. We believe that an asymmetric distribution of the main syntactic and cognitive mechanisms related cognitive subject, and certainly with the negative form of asymmetry in the degree of the object tag syntax negative form of relevant, "so as not to" affirming and denying the disappearance of the opposition also related cognitive mechanisms.Chapter Five discusses the purpose unmarked form sentences. Objective category there are some fixed unmarked forms of expression, usually between two components in the sense of having a "purpose- Behavior" relationship. Unmarked more typical forms: Table purposes linked phrase( "VP1 + VP2"), the purpose of the table verb-object phrase( "V + purpose "), the purpose of the table and phrases( "VP1 [make / call / make] + tightening sentence S2 + VP2 ") and table purposes. Marked with the purpose of the sentence is different, they all have special features in the syntax, semantics and pragmatics. In addition, these unmarked object form, there are some differences in the degree of strength of the righteous purpose. These differences reflect the cognitive characteristics of cognitive subject, that is, there is a certain similarity between the two image. Our main iconicity theory and discuss its subjective aspects from cognitive linguistics, to arrive at the underlying causes of their cognitive.Chapter Six discusses the purpose of the category is more typical constructions. "For the X and Y" and "X-sake" These two constructions are typical, and are made of the same ingredients in the composition of variable chemical composition, which came in two formats have a variable component limits. Both constructions have exceeded their constituents, "implication", as this is not the implication contained in its composition, it can be concluded is generated by the structural formula. Constructional meaning generation and Gestalt principles are closely related, and because the two constructions of constructional meaning for both sides to exchange the well known and, therefore, the principles associated with the language of economics.Chapter Seven of complex sentences from the perspective of the theory of three-domain object to inspect complex sentence. Three-domain complex sentence, is known domain, the domain line and say domain. From academic research on the complex sentence of three domains of view, the purpose of the article discusses complex sentence much. Since the purpose of the complex sentence "purpose" has a strong subjective, it can be understood in three domains purpose complex sentence, known larger proportion of total domain, the domain line and say domain account for a smaller proportion. Objective three-domain complex sentence complex sentences and other three-domain have in common, but also has its own characteristics. Also exists between the purpose of the three-domain complex sentences crossing phenomenon is known domain and the domain row, row domain and cross-domain and Speech and Language domain knowledge domain. The objective of this phenomenon also shows that cross domain boundaries blur of three. For purposes of the three-domain complex sentence particularity, we mainly discuss from their subjectivity and subjective perspective.Chapter Eight is a comparative study of the scope of the purpose of the two Chinese and Korean languages. We Chinese, Korean purpose of the analysis of the collected corpus, the situation of both languages express purpose to distinguish and classify, summarize the characteristics of various situations. Compared with the purpose of the category Korean Chinese has its own characteristics, we first sort out the purpose of the category Korean, mainly from the concept of "purpose", "purpose" concept contrast adjacent thereto, the "purpose" of expression, Korean purpose category analysis of generalization and so on. Korean purpose category, the goal marked a very important role, there are two main purposes mark mode, that is, connection and verb stem endings. This is also the Korean and Chinese compared to the most significant features. Both Chinese and Korean languages are quite different in the expression of complex sentences, mainly in syntax, semantics and pragmatics. This difference in form, reflecting the differences in the two languages user awareness. Therefore, we start from the cultural differences between the two languages, try to analyze them.Chapter Nine is the conclusion.