Research On Basic Medical Insurance System Of China

As U.S President Washington said:"justice is the most important cornerstone of the good government, justice is the most important national policy core values, however, how to ensure that in the formulation and implementation of national policies to achieve" fair "but is not easy. Because of any policy to promote the respective fields two sides in this process, some people may be benefited while the other was damaged. The face value of the priority ranking, resulting in a "conflict of interest" in the formulation of public policy because of the limited resources of the government. In the process of policy formulation, the beneficiaries tend to be more than the losers unite to protect their own interests.After the implementation of China’s basic medical insurance system, with the issue of fairness has become the focus of attention and focus, Including how medical resources, an equitable distribution of the burden of medical expenses are reasonable, health care is in line with demand. A lot of controversy involved with the fairness, and therefore, the implementation and practice of equity, the current health care system is particularly important. This paper attempts to Rawls and Daniels on the theory of equitable distribution of medical resources in the evolution process of combing our medical security system based on the use of the Daniels10fairness mark China’s current basic medical insurance system fair conduct in-depth analysis, and in the light of international experience to explore the establishment of a scientific and comprehensive principles of equitable distribution of medical resources, in order to achieve the goal of equitable access to medical insurance for.Introduction section to clarify that the paper topics reason as well as domestic and international medical insurance system or the fairness of the medical insurance system present situation and problems, and are described in this study and the thesis framework.The first chapter introduces the principle of the allocation of medical resources, but also the theoretical basis of this article. This chapter is divided into three parts, first define the meaning of fairness and impartiality, and then introduced John Rawls and Daniels about fairness theory. Rawls ’Theory of Justice, including the social contract, the original position with the two principles of justice, while Daniels healthcare justice theory is to play the Rawls’ Theory of Justice to the results of the health care field.The fair value target angle from the policy-making in the second chapter reviews the evolution of the medical insurance system in China since the founding of the People’s Republic of China. Development of traditional medicine from the planned economy period of the public health, labor insurance medical care, and rural cooperative medical care as the main form of protection to the current basic medical insurance for urban workers, urban residents basic medical insurance and new rural cooperative medical care three basic medical insurance system for the main modern medical security system, the Chinese government egalitarianism to the efficiency in the value of target selection on the experience first and then a fair return to the rational process.Chapter Ⅲ:depth analysis of the fairness of the current basic medical insurance system. Daniels ten fairness marked the main use of standards, examine our current system of fairness, efficiency and accountability can be three main objectives of the degree of realization.Chapter Ⅳ of international experience. Select several targeted countries to introduce the medical insurance system, such as the German social health insurance, medical savings accounts in Singapore and India’s universal health insurance system, the fairness of the meaning of these national policies on the allocation of medical resources for the China’s medical security system to provide a reference.The fifth chapter is the concluding part. Establish a set of the fairness and justice of the basic medical insurance system is everyone’s expectations, the focus of this thesis. Due to limited health care resources, how to make a fair and reasonable allocation of the basic considerations of public policy. China’s medical insurance system in the system design to achieve wide coverage, and a variety of inequities in the actual running process is rooted in the institutional unfair. Therefore, one of fairness and justice and sustainable development of the medical insurance system in order to truly bring health and happiness for all, but also the ardent desire of the author in-depth study of this thesis.