The Concrete Of Dialectics

The fundamental theoretical purport this paper explored is Marx's logic. In theMarx philosophy research, Marx's"logic"is an ambiguous area and has not producedextensive consensus in the research. However, since Marx's philosophy is aphilosophical theory form, so it must has the core mode of thinking inevitably thatdistinguished from all other philosophy. The expression of this mode of thinkingshould be the logic of Marx. This paper's core idea is that dig deeper into the logic ofHegel and reveals the logic of Marx through the compare research of the Hegel andMarx, and through analysis different understanding to Marx and Hegel on the concreteof dialectics. So that the research on the logic of Marx turn to be a theory ofconsciousness.Negating, criticizing abstraction is the logic's starting point that the concrete ofdialectics implemented neither Hegel nor Marx's. But the two critique of the abstract isnot the same.Hegel thought that the traditional metaphysics's intellectual understanding to theconcept (Judge)was a kind of abstract. The purpose to criticize the abstract is not todeny this content's deterministic that obtained by intellectual, but to deny theobjectivity that the form getting truth . Hegel's critique is not a certain abstract theorypremise, is not some kind of established knowledge content(those are his dialecticallinks), but a abstract understanding to the truth content. This abstract regard the truthof judge or proposition as unconscious theory premise. Therefore, Hegel put forwardhis unique philosophy path to prove the truth from abstract to concrete .Hegel's logic that from abstract to concrete is a system "mutual regulation of theconcept". This view is not the same with not only the general understanding to Hegel but also Hegel's location to himself. Hegel thought that his philosophy is a system "selfregulation of the concept". But, through the reflection of the"self regulation of theconcept" we found that the reason why "Being" has the self regulating ability isbecause two settings that Hegel had done on the logic beginning: the Being in and foritself; the others. Hegel's"in itself"guarantee his philosophy agree to the traditional idea,"for itself" and "the others" provide power for the initiative. Being and the othersconstruct the system "mutual regulation of the concept" commonly. Being has lost itsabsolute freedom dimension. Thus, Hegel's for itself came to be a false for itself, it is akind of pure logic hypothesis. While there is a striking consistency between the logicand reality. Hegel's Being in and for itself characterized the people's newunderstanding about freedom in its reality. People as the individual is free. This rightsis given by the idea. But this freedom is not absolutely, this freedom is restricted by theothers, by the rationality. But this rationality is a false abstract, this abstract is things,capital. The freedom of "the Individual"is restricted by things that abstracted from"common people "or "others" . This is the second form in the history of mankind thatMarx said: "human independence based on the dependence of things". This is theexistence of human beings that Hegel show perfectly based on being in and for itself .There is difference on the understanding of abstract between Marx and Hegel. Ina certain sense, Marx discovered Hegel's rationality that his philosophy is a logic thatprove the truth. This logic is the whole from being to the concept definition. Everyfixed concept as the logical link is an abstract. Marx used this "abstraction" as arational method in to "On Capital". This method is a "narrative method"from abstractto concrete. The abstract became to be a capacity to characterize the real things. In thenegative sense, Marx treat the theory system that rule the reality(abstract) as the objectof criticism. Specifically, this abstract is theory that used by the national economistssuch as Hegel. The reason why this theory is abstract is because such a theory endowthe time theoretical premise with a eternal meaning beyond history. Capitalism Marxcriticized is on eternal the premise of capitalist private property. Marx realized hiscritique to capitalist economy system through the critique to the private property. He established a new concept regulation system. This is the theory system about the thirddevelopment form in the history of mankind historical.We can re-examine Marx's dialectics(from the abstract to the concrete) throughhis two different understandings about abstract. For Marx, from the abstract to theconcrete is not only a writing method of "On Capital", but also a logic understandingabout the dialectical development in historical era. The former, Marx received ascientific system to prove truth. The latter, Marx gained the consciousness abouthistorical era (absolute) and historic (relative). Marx formed an understanding on thetimes not only certainly but also historically. Marx transcend the understanding thatregarding truth as "absolute", and achieve an understanding regarding the truth as"relatively absolute". Any era is not unprecedented and unrepeatable, it is its ownintermediary.Hegel's from the abstract to the concrete is through an logical link intermediarywhich is judgment (reflect regulations of the conception); Marx's from the abstract tothe concrete is through an logical link intermediary which is a system that conceptdefined. Hegel realized the transition through the self regulation of concept, Marxrealized the transition through the systems of concept regulation. So it is moreadvanced form. This is Marx's "logic".It achieve a new understanding of the logic of Marx according to research Marxand Hegel's Dialectics of the concrete understanding. It is not only beneficial tounderstanding Marx and Hegel between theoretical inheritance relations, but also haverevelatory effect to explore the association of Marx and modern western philosophy.Marx's significance as a philosophical history link revealed. This new understandingon Marx's make Marx philosophy preserved.The understanding on Marx's dialectic of the concrete constitute theunderstanding on Marx's logic. The understanding on Marx's logic has advantageous tounderstanding on Marx's whole philosophy thoughts. Marx's logic discovery is helpfulfor us to form a theory of consciousness——take the absolute truth of concept systemas the relative truth of logical link. This consciousness of logic has great theoretical significance for us to form new understanding on the world and history. Marx achieveda transition process of definition system, and this kind of transition is the developmentof historical reality.