| "Shine-usu Inscription","Taryat Inscription","Tes Inscription","Qaraqalabasun Inscription","Severy Inscription","Suji Inscription" are main inscriptions in Uighur Khanate period. Because they are original records by people left, so whether in linguistics, or in history have higher academic value. Since the 19th century, Eastern and Western Turkic scholars have conducted a painstaking research, achieved fruitful results, and formated Turkic philology on this basement.However, because of those disciplines barriers existing, Turkic interdisciplinary academic research has been slow. At the same time, the phenomenon that who studing the history didn't the language and studing the language hasn't basic history is already exsited. Therefore, those on the basis on the history record studing the language or on the basis on the document language studing the history, are the best way to resolve the difficult in inscription research appeaing, and are the best cross on linguistics,history,ethnology. Therefore, histoire philologique and national linguistic theory as a guide, with language comparison,historical data and identification, this article again summarises the language and history datas of "Shine-usu Inscription","Taryat Inscription","Tes Inscription","Qaraqalabasun Inscription","Severy Inscription","Suji Inscription"in Uighur Khanate period.In this paper, the main structure is divided into three parts: introduction, text, appendix.Foreword includes: the introduction to Uighur Khanate history and culture; the summary to Uighur Khanate old Turkic inscriptions grammar; the reviewal to the research of Uighur Khanate old Turkic inscriptions; the significance and methods to study Uighur Khanate old Turkic inscriptions. I believe that Uighur was born from Sibi, the family name meant "forest people", and Uighur Khanate was not a true country. At the same time, I agree that our country scholars denied the version of the Turkic runes was born from Sogdians", and I think it was from Mongolian Plateau, the phoneme-syllable characters on the basic on picture language.The text narratived with traditional created age of inscription, includes the overview to inscriptions,the research summary,the transcription with Latin alphabet,Chinese translation,the interpretation and argument, the language characteristics,the historical data. The first,the second belong a common-sense introduction to the inscription; the transcription and interpretation major select different points, introduce own recommendations; linguistic characteristics are referring to the more prominent,representable of grammar rules,voice phenomenon in the inscriptions; historical information is summarized the great historical facts in inscriptions.About language characteristics of the first section, I consider the conclusion about old Turkic s/(sˇ) dialect is too early, and most of old Turkic sentences belong to the water sentence, lack of the necessary connections. Affected by Chinese, the parataxis means is obvious. About the history information, I think that Cik is Ju, rather than scholars once thought Chi. At the same time, I also think Idg is Ade; while three flags Turkic people is the core of Turkic tribes.About the language features of Section II, I believe the composite method of transposition in old Turkic is in fact the predecessor of modern Kazakh homophony formation;γcan be used as a verb past the first-type additional character. About the history information, I think Uighur ancestors had ascended the throne early in the 4th century; early Uighur khanates official was not perfect; Uighur khanates early had invasived Tarim Basin on 756; for oγuz/uyγur is a homonym of the name, the key to differentiate must depend on the time, place and author.About the language features of section III, I believe that old Turkic third person pronoun had latly been produced, the word-building capacity of cells had been declined. About the history information, I think the contact was possible existed between yolluy qaγan and Northern Wei Tavγac; splited part of Oguz on the 7th and 8th century had convergence, and become the largest Turkic family on the South Russian steppe-Volga River; Pei Qinei were composed by splited parts of Uighur on the 7th century and these tribes in Syr Darya basin; Qasar could be divided into Sibi Qasar and Turkic Qasar, and they had convergenced to set up their national around the 8th century in Caspian Sea.About the history information of the fourth quarter, I think: the routes that Manichaeism entered Uighur Khanate were : River-Tarim-Central Plains-Uighur Khanate,River-Gaochang-Uighur Khanate,River-West Turkic- Uighur Khanate,the time perhaps was in the 6th century; one of backgrounds that Uighur Khanate had believed in Manichaeism was taking the throne; in Uighur Khanate strong period, Gaochang had become the center of East Manicheism.About the history information of Section V, I think: before Uighur westward migration, a part of Uighur already had entered Ganzhou region, and operated there; from the 8th century, Uighur Khanate potential had start to dump the West, and strongly ruled Gaochang,Yanqi,Kuci and so on.About the language features of Section VI, I think: the writing of monument was different from the Yenisey inscriptions clearly, using rhyme form was different from Uighur khanates inscriptions. About the history information, I think: Manichaeism in different inter-tribal development was uneven; Qirqiz had used Sibi that it was earlier language than old Turkic.However, because of my job is to engage in language, and therefore too much reliance on the language group to determine the ethnic source, the ethnic relations to examine the language. This will inevitably lead to excessive emphasis on reading corpus, ignore the ancient records. This is unavoidable birth defects in this article.
|
PDF Full Text Request