A Study Of Structure Of Injury Factors Of PE And Its Prevention In China

As we all known there is risk in almost everything, so does Pysical education. But as Croner said "The value of school sports and physical education is not disputed and there is no suggestion that these activities have to be avoided simly because they carry an inherent risk of injury" Carole Raymond also said "Safety considerations are not intended to restrict the essential practical and challenging nature of physical education but to create and manage a safe learning environment that controls and minimises the risk". So in order to find better ways to ristict the risk in pysical education, this study used many ways including case study, quasi-experimentation, questionnaire investigation,etc to study the factors that influnce the safety of pysical education.By the method of structure equation modeling, we found there are four safety elements which are relevant to the risk of pysical education. They are the unsafe behavior of teacher and students, the unsafe state of equipment and entironment, the bad management of pysical educatin and some social problemes. The standardized regression weights are 0.88, 0.84,0.81, and 0.70. So the methods to prevent the safety accidents in pysical education must be based on the four factors.Using the method of questionnaire investigation this study also found that the safety consciousnesses of studens are at a low levell, the teachers'responsibility for work needs to be improved. Besides these the conditions of equipments are also not very good, and there is a significent difference between the west and the east (p=.000), and also the west and the middle (p=.001).In order to test the effect of educational inervention on improving the students'safety consciousnesses, we used quasi-experimentation to carry out the work. After three months, the educational intervention in experimental group turned out to be a good result. The main effect of educational intervention is significent at the significance level of 0.05 (F= 55.13, P<.001), the educational interaction effect of grade is also significent(F=11.22,P<.001),and so does the gender(F=8.36,P<.01).