Research In The Problem Of Russia's Fiscal Deceutralization

Since 1991,Russia has carried on series of political and economical restructuring,in this series of reforms ,the most important item is the delimitation of the government responsibility. The government structure is changing into the Federal system from the unitary system. . This change suggests that because of marketization of Russia's distribution of resources mechanism, the public service including infrastructure is localizing gradually. Therefore, the government functions decentralization, the finance decentralization and the local government reform has been the most universal tendencies.How to establish the marketable finance decentralization successfully , reviewing for 15 years,seeking the best balance between the central government authorities management and fiscal decentralization , it has profound theory significance and the significant practice instruction value.Although no one did research in statistics seriously, the facts told us that the practice in fiscal decentralization mostly occurred in developed countries in the past. From 1970's, Dillinger pointed out 75% developing nations had the population beyond 5,000,000 in 1994 report. Most countries began to shift the central financial authority to the locality except 12 countries. This authority change even already occurred in the central-authority countries, like Jordan, Morocco, Eastern Europe's Soviet countries, China and so on. These changes explained that the activities about fiscal decentralization inherited from the former and it also inherited the former theory tradition in some extent. Because the contemporary environment in economy, politics and society are different, the activities about fiscal decentralization in contemporary are not the same as the former. It would develop in line with request of the new background, which had decided the innovation in fiscal decentralization theories fundamentally.The fiscal decentralization theory was developing with two core questions. The first one was the power discussion that took the efficiency as the centralization. The mark was the book"A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures"which was wrote by Tiebout in 1956. The second one was the...