The Comparative Study About The Cullectivization Village And Decentralized Village Development Patterns Since Reform And Opening Up

Since the reform and opening-up, Chinese rural development pattern is differ from collectivization pattern in the movement of people’s commune. Most of the villages turn into decentralized village.These organizational forms are household separate management of individual, village collective economic become increasingly weak, village collective economic organizations become virtual, village resources become increasingly decentralization, individual economy and private economy are gradually the main economic sector. But,just as there were some individual managements in the movement of people’s commune, some villages still insist collective management, the main economic sector is collective economic,the main organizations are organized, cooperative, collectivize,and these villages have became common prosperity step by step,these villages are called "collectivization villages".China is a great village power,village constitute the Chinese rural basic unit. The different village development roads and patterns refract the developing venations of Chinese agriculture,country,and peasant. Since the establishment of People’s Republic of China, especially, since reform and opening up, the collectivization villages and decentralized villages coexist and co-develop, nowaday,the foundation and condition about studying the development patterns of the collectivization villages and decentralized villages are suited. The collectivization villages and decentralized villages are the miniature of Chinese country. However, the study about Xiaogang,Huaxi,and Nanjiecun fall into misunderstanding of the extreme Leftism or extreme Rightism because of political,ideology,and culture. The extreme Leftism considers the period of movement of people’s commune was the best period of development history,but agricultural household contract responsibility system interrupted the history oriented socialism and communism. The Rightism denies the all historical achievements of collectivization, deems agricultural household management which has promoted Chinese rural development,claims that would further impulse thoroughly privatization to accelerate rural development.In philosophy, the pinko is that subjectivity surpass objectivity,the right deviationer is that subjectivity fall behind objectivity. Whether the pinko or the right deviationer, the subjectivity does not conform to objectivity. The collectivization development pattern and decentralized development pattern are not incompatible,which is in order to realize people’s interests.The study will try to break the thinking confine of the extreme Leftism and extreme Rightism, objectively, dialectically, roundly analyze history and development of Chinese villages.This paper would comparative analysis the collectivization development pattern and decentralized development pattern based on the survey of Nanjiecun,Huaxicun,and Jiangdiancun, deeply explore their development status, problems, tendency and development experiences. This paper would merge together the two development patterns,explore the new pattern and road to construct the new socialism countryside and integration with city.This paper includes five chapters.Chapter One:The definition and evolution of the collectivization development pattern and decentralized development patternThe issues of agriculture, farmer and rural area is the basic problem of China during the revolution, construction,and reformation period. The main influence factors are two,the one is land system,the another is agricultural management modes.Their revolution decides the status and tendency of village development. This section would describe the development track and evolutionary trend of the more Chinese villages during the Period of the land reformation, the cooperative movement, the people’s commune movement,and the reform and opening up,would explain divergences and debates within the party during different periods, emphasize to explore development performances and experiences of times of collectivization.Chapter Two:the study about historical route and development performance of collective village development since reform and opening upThis section would analyze different development patterns of collectivization villages since reform and opening up based on the view angle of organization form, economic and industry structure, location characteristic, resource conditions, cultural concept.This section would analyze personality characteristics and common rules of different development patterns of collectivization villages, profoundly analysis the development motivation, current situation,problems,and merit and demerit, compare the difference and connection with the collectivization period, summarize the development experiences of collectivization villages,and justly explore the different queryes on the collectivization villages.Chapter Three:the study about development pattern of decentralized village since reform and opening upThis section not only include the case study,but also the classified study, based on the economic development, democratic politics, organization level, public life, community welfare of the decentralized villages.This section would analyze the development status,problems,and cause,emphasize the merit and demerit based on peasants’organization collective economy,and village self-governance, comparative study the collectivization villages with the decentralized villages, reveal the influence factors and development tendency of the decentralized villages.Chapter Founthe comparative study of the collective village and decentralized village development Since the reform and opening upThis section mainly compare the development factors of the collective and decentralized village based on the study of development evolution and current situation,furtherly analyse the power derived from the village organizing, economy, politics, culture, ecology.We would explore the internal factors,drive power, and ability of village development, in order to push forward the village development economic and social.Chapter Five:pattern selection and countermeasure analysis of new socialism rural construction——in view of city and countryside integrationNeither collective economy nor household managing is a cut,would build a new type of agricultural management system, push the moderate scale management, enhance endogenous power and energy of village development, according to the actual conditions and the people’s needs.This section would break the thinking mode of leftism or rightism, objectively, dialectically, roundly explore the internal logic and evolutionary trend of the development pattern of collectivization and decentralized village in view of economy,politics,culture,and social governance,analyze the effect and problem of collectivization and decentralized village to propel rural urbanization, industrialization,and agricultural modernization, merge together the two development mode,explore the new pattern and road to build a new type of agricultural management system, advance the urban-rural integration development.