The Study Of The Phonology Of "Long Yao Hand Mirror"

Long Kan Shou Jing is written by Xing Jun, who is a monk at the end of the tenth Century AD in Liao Dynasty for people to reading sutras. In recent years, the study of this book is mostly limited to philology and dictionary compilation, and the value of phonology in this book has not been given enough attention. The book is written in the late Middle Ages, a contemporary of Guangyun. The phonological analysis of Long Kan Shou Jing provides information for phonetic research.There are seven sections of this article: introduction and chapter one to six.Introduction includes the introduction of Long Kan Shou Jing the explanatory notes, the author, the spread content collection, the research status, and the research methods etc..The first chapter is the Fanqie Comparison of Long Kan Shou Jing and Guang Yun. In Long Kan Shou Jing, the number of Zhiyin occupies about 1/3, and most of them have the same fanqie in Guang Yun. The words included in both of the two books, if the same phonetics, the vast majority of Fanqie words is the same. However, if the different phonetics, most Fanqie were different in one word, and very few of them are different in two words. In comparison of the different phonetics of the two books, the mixed rhyming categories were used. The number of different rhyming Categories is very large, but the frequency of each category is low. The situation of phonetics words and being phonetics words have multiple pronunciations occurs many times, and there are different in the two books.The second chapter is the analysis of initial consonants. By comparing the Long Kan Shou Jing phonology with the Guangyun phonology, it obtains four characteristics: first, Long Kan Shou Jing has Qingzhonghunqie less than 10%. Second, the relationship among Zhizhuangzhang and Duan group and Jing group. Zhi and Duan confounded use is relatively huge, while Zhang and Duan, Zhuang and Jing are also have a little confounded use. Zhang and Zhi have a little confounded use, whereas Zhang and Zhuang rarely have confounded use. Third one is the confounded use of Ni, Niang and Ri is similar with Guang Yun. Fourth,Jian group and Xiao group confounded use is great variety, but less in quantity.The third chapter is the analysis of rhyme, which can be roughly divided into three types. First, the same rhyme combine in Tong,Geng,Liu,Xian,Zhi,Zhen group. Second, the mixed use in the same group includes Tong, Shan, Xiao, and Dang group. Third, the usages of different rhyme group focus on Tong and Jiang, Zhi and Xie,Guo and Jia,Dang and Geng.The fourth chapter is the comparison other contemporary rhyme and rhyme tables with Long Kan Shou Jing. The Long Kan Shou Jing contains more ancient rhyme, but in the meanwhile, has some modern rhyme. With the occurrence of phonetic change in the Song Dynasty, the Long Kan Shou Jing does not show changes, or only shows initial stage of the changes. The study of Long Kan Shou Jing's phonology can be very helpful for the study of the phonological research.The fifth chapter is the collation from the phonological perspective. We use the Zhong Hua Book Company photo-printing Korea version as the original script, in the process of proofreading the Long Kan Shou Jing phonetic material, finding a lot of errors. On the one hand, it may be the author's carelessness when composed the book; on the other hand, it may be the printing errors during the spread of the book version by version since there are also great differences among different versions.The sixth chapter is the conclusion of this study.