The Truth Of Art Perspectives About Heidegger And Adorno

Abstrac:Art truth problem is not only the difficulties of traditional art philosophy,and focus on the core issue of modern aesthetics.The art whether can carry the truth,and art is how revealed the truth,these problems has always been plagued by many philosophers from ancient Greece to modern times,formed an independent problem domain.Early poet put forward the problem of the relation between art and truth,but it does not give a reasonable explanation.Philosopher caught the confusion of the poet and t seeked the most reasonable explanation.since Socrates' school and the wise school established the truth in the presence of polar opposite,after system interpretation by Plato and Aristotle and medieval and Renaissance history,art's theory presents diversification trend,from the poles to the middle,from radical to moderate,from the general trend of opposing to the fusion,and did not form a linear development approach.Heidegger and adorno reflected on the artistic truth problem,and made a different answer.There is a big difference about its academic tradition and theoretical purport between them,but to some extent there is the possibility of potential dialogue.They believe that art can be revealed the truth.Heidegger's thought is,the truth can be set into the work of art itself.Works of art created and preserved the existence of truth.Adorno thinks the truth is the essential of art.Existence of the necessity and rationality about modernism art is for its truth content.They both saw a save force in art.It is art's modern functions,with the disenchantment of the world and the advancement of rationalization,after artistic independence autonomy.In some extent,their art theory is a kind of pathological diagnosis on the issue of modernity.Truth of art has reached the most profound philosophical interpretations in the contemporary In Heidegger and Adorno.Heidegger thinks that art is the basic planning way,and believe that art can open the meaning of the original space,to correct the real world of rational misuse.Adorno regards art as a negative for alienation of social reality.Heidegger and adorno in the final analysis regard the art as a hedge against a basic way of instrumental rationality.Although some of adorno and heidegger's idea does exist similar or similarities,but from the overall,they belong to two different philosophical schools,after all,surface consistency does not cover depth differences.Heidegger proposed to the "close thought " to correct technical rationality of the "image thought",In order to promote the way of thinking to change.Range of thought advocated the affinity relationship between people and things,to rethink the meaning of existence.Hope that human beings can live in a world full of poetic.Adorno through meditation on art truth problem is put forward to the art of the "imitation thought" to achieve "object priority principle",in order to overcome the expansion of the instrumental rationality.Both the thought of "close" or the thought of "imitation" are seeking non-confrontational reconciliation between people and things,just the two philosophy have taken a different path,but the finish is the same."Natural" and "the earth" are adorno and heidegger's two important instructive concepts in the theory.Adorno's aesthetic theory maintains that natural beauty is the most basic level,the art due to imitate nature charges the distorted world by capitalism.Concept of "earth" in heidegger's art theory has the same basic position.Heidegger desire a poetry and linguistic earth to rescue the destroyed earth by the technology.Adorno is trying to an idea land dehumanization nature to criticize and deny the world which controlled by instrumental rationality and capitalism.Heidegger's earth only can render through the dialogue between poetry and thought.Although there is difference between the connotation of the earth and natural,they still have possibility of dialouge and communication.Adorno and heidegger believed that art is a "mystery" general things.The deep differences is that the answer at the origin ancient or in reality.Adorno's "mystery" of art rooted in social reality.But Heidegger seek the answer to back off of the original state.Adorno's art truth directly points to the powerful social system,in order to pass the alienation of state on the monopoly capitalism stage.Heidegger's art theory refers to the original state before the rational differentiation,hidden the tendency of the eternal.Questions about the acceptance and interpretation of art,Heidegger and Adorno stood on the position of elitism criticized aesthetic hedonism strongly,and opposed to treat art as experience,entertainment and consumption,at this point they reached agreement.To some extent,both of them made excessive interpretation on art truth problem.Art seems to be difficult to bear.The ommon western centralism and elitist position of them,In the very great degree cancelled the possibility of the general public to grasp the truth of art.Theory shows good prospects and the vision is pale in the face of reality.Salvation ideal eventually became the illusion.They respectively from the Angle of ontology and negative dialectics reached the peak of modern times about the problem of art truth.At the same time,it also exposed the limitations of the problem itself.If Aesthetic limited to the philosophy of art,will lack the attention of humanity beauty and constitutional beauty,so must be returned to the position of marxist political aesthetics.