Font Size: a A A

Modulation Of The Surface/Interface Structure Of TiO2 And Their Photocatalytic Reactivity

Posted on:2019-03-30Degree:DoctorType:Dissertation
Country:ChinaCandidate:M ZhaoFull Text:PDF
GTID:1361330626951898Subject:Materials science
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
With the explosion of world population,the energy crisis and environment issues are the swords that hang over the top of human beings.To prevent further deterioration of these problems,researchers have tried their best to find alternative clean energy and depress environmental pollution.Photocatalysis is one of the environmentally friendly technologies to convert solar energy into chemical energy for the promising applications of the photodegradation of target pollutants and photocatalytic splitting water into hydrogen.Since photocatalytic redox reactions take place on the surface of photocatalyst,it is of great importance to study the surface/interface of the semiconductor photocatalyst.This study focuses on the surface/interface modulation of the classical photocatalyst TiO2,and mainly explores the effects of surface electronic structure and reaction environment on photocatalytic performance.The research contents of this study mainly include:?1?The facet engineering of brookite TiO2 was carried out to investigate the effect of surface electronic structure on photocatalytic reactivity.The brookite TiO2nanocrystals mainly exposed with{121}and{211}facet were obtained by adjusting the alkalinity of the precursor solution,which were recorded as T121 and T211,respectively.Theoretical calculations reveal that the{121}surface contains more undercoordinated Ti atoms and a higher surface energy than that of the{211}surface,and the experimental results show that brookite TiO2 nanorods exposed with majority{121}facet(T121)have a more positive valence band potential;those above mentioned superior properties enable T121 to show excellent performance in RhB photodegradation.Nevertheless,the electronic structure analyzed from the Density of State plots revealed that the electron prefers to be dispersed in the bulk for TiO2covered with a{121}surface,indicating that the electrons might be more reluctant to migrate from bulk to surface,which might be the reason for the poor H2 productivity of T121.In contrast,brookite TiO2 nanosheets exposed with dominant{211}facets(T211)exhibited a more negative conduction band potential resulting in a much higher H2 evolution rate(801?mol h-1)in photocatalytic water splitting.Accordingly,combining the analyses of the surface atomic structure and electronic band structure,it is indicated that,for brookite TiO2,the{121}surface is beneficial for photocatalytic oxidation reactions while the{211}surface can facilitate the photocatalytic reduction process.?2?Based on the brookite TiO2(T121 and T211)with adjustable band structure,the Au@TiO2 system was constructed to study the effect of the surface electronic structure of TiO2 on the hot electrons transfer process.On the basis of the conclusion in part?1?,T211 exhibits a much higher conduction band potential.Thus,the Au@T211shows a larger Schottky barrier than Au@T121.The effect of the surface electronic structure of TiO2 on the hot electrons transfer is different under various light irradiation.Under high-intensity photoexcitation(visible light,??29?400 nm,338 mW cm-2),the accumulation of hot-electrons will negatively shift the EF of Au and ensure the consecutive injection to the conduction band of TiO2,thus hot-electrons over T211with more reductive potential and better charge transfer will be more promising.Hence,the photocatalytic H2 production of Au@T211 is about 2.5 times higher than that of Au@T121 under visible light irradiation.However,under low-intensity light excitation(monochromic light,about 220 mW cm-2),a higher Schottky barrier will impede the hot-electron transfer to some extent due to the low accumulation of hot electrons.Consequently,the discrepancy of AQE measured upon the monochromatic light irradiation between Au@T211 and Au@T121 is smaller than 2.5 times.Therefore,the surface electronic structure of TiO2 affects the transfer of hot electrons at the interface of Au/TiO2 and on the surface of TiO2 which further impacts on the photocatalytic H2 evolution reactivity.?3?The reaction environment was modulated to explore the mechanism of the alkali-induced enhancement of H2 evolution.Experimentally,The H2 evolution efficiency over Au@TiO2 measured at pH=13.7 is 280 times higher than that at pH=6.0.In order to study the relationship between the TiO2 surface and alkaline environment,we constructed the Au@TiO2 system and investigate the mechanism of alkali-enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution?surface potential shift?SPS?or methanol oxidation?MO??.Under visible light irradiation,the architecture of Au@TiO2 can easily separate the reduction process?occurred on TiO2 surface,only related to SPS?and the oxidation process?occurred on Au surface,only related to MO?in physical space.To explore the dominant factor for the H2 evolution enhancement,two investigation schemes are designed.For Au@ST01 system?ST01,a commercial anatase TiO2?,the dominant role of the SPS on the H2 evolution enhancement is semiquantitatively calculated via the open-circuit potential test?more than 80%at pH?27?13.5 and exceeds 50%at pH?13.5?.This conclusion is further proved by EIS and photoresponse current tests.For Au@T100 and Au@T101 system(T100 and T101,facet-optimized anatase TiO2),the ratio of H2 evolution rates(rH2(Au@T100)/rH2(Au@T101))exhibits a irregular fluctuation,which manifests the decisive role of SPS.Evidenced by these two investigation schemes,this work clarifies that the enhancement of H2 evolution is dominated by the alkali-induced negative shift of the surface potential and meanwhile is complemented by the accelerated methanol oxidation.
Keywords/Search Tags:Photocatalysis, TiO2, Surface/interface modulation, Au plasmonic photosensitization
PDF Full Text Request
Related items