Dependence of hotspot initiation on void distribution in high explosive crystals simulated with molecular dynamics |
| Posted on:2011-12-02 | Degree:Ph.D | Type:Dissertation |
| University:University of California, Davis | Candidate:Herring, Stuart Davis | Full Text:PDF |
| GTID:1441390002470058 | Subject:Molecular physics |
| Abstract/Summary: | PDF Full Text Request |
| Microscopic defects may dramatically affect the susceptibility of high explosives to shock initiation. Such defects redirect the shock's energy and become hotspots (concentrations of stress and heat) that can initiate chemical reactions. Sufficiently large or numerous defects may produce a self-sustaining deflagration or even detonation from a shock notably too weak to detonate defect-free samples.;The effects of circular or spherical voids on the shock sensitivity of a model (two- or three-dimensional) high explosive crystal are considered. We simulate a piston impact using molecular dynamics with a Reactive Empirical Bond Order (REBO) model potential for a sub-micron, sub-ns exothermic reaction in a diatomic molecular solid. In both dimensionalities, the probability of initiating chemical reactions rises more suddenly with increasing piston velocity for larger voids that collapse more deterministically. A void of even 10 nm radius (∼39 interatomic spacings) reduces the minimum initiating velocity by a factor of 4 (8 in 3D).;The transition at larger velocities to detonation is studied in micron-long samples with a single void (and its periodic images). Reactions during the shock traversal increase rapidly with velocity, then become a reliable detonation. In 2D, a void of radius 2.5 nm reduces the critical velocity by 10% from the perfect crystal; a Pop plot of the detonation delays at higher velocities shows a characteristic pressure dependence. 3D samples are more likely to react but less to detonate.;In square lattices of voids, reducing the (common) void radius or increasing the porosity without changing the other parameter causes the hotspots to consume the material faster and detonation to occur sooner and at lower velocities. Early behavior is seen to follow a very simple ignition and growth model; the pressure exponents are more realistic than with single voids.;The hotspots collectively develop a broad pressure wave (a sonic, diffuse deflagration front) that triggers detonation when it reaches the lead shock. Reaction yields from triangular lattices are insignificantly different. Random void arrangements delay detonation by 15.5% but introduce a standard deviation of just 5.1%. |
| Keywords/Search Tags: | Void, Detonation, Shock, Molecular |
PDF Full Text Request |
Related items |