Font Size: a A A

Nozzle erosion characterization and minimization for high-pressure rocket motor applications

Posted on:2011-10-20Degree:Ph.DType:Dissertation
University:The Pennsylvania State UniversityCandidate:Evans, BrianFull Text:PDF
GTID:1442390002957459Subject:Engineering
Abstract/Summary:
Understanding of the processes that cause nozzle throat erosion and developing methods for mitigation of erosion rate can allow higher operating pressures for advanced rocket motors. However, erosion of the nozzle throat region, which is a strong function of operating pressure, must be controlled to realize the performance gains of higher operating pressures. The objective of this work was the study the nozzle erosion rates at a broad range of pressures from 7 to 34.5 MPa (1,000 to 5,000 psia) using two different rocket motors. The first is an instrumented solidpropellant motor (ISPM), which uses two baseline solid propellants; one is a non-metallized propellant called Propellant S and the other is a metallized propellant called Propellant M. The second test rig is a non-metallized solid-propellant rocket motor simulator (RMS). The RMS is a gas rocket with the ability to vary the combustion-product species composition by systematically varying the flow rates of gaseous reactants. Several reactant mixtures were utilized in the study to determine the relative importance of different oxidizing species (such as H2O, OH, and CO2). Both test rigs are equipped with a windowed nozzle section for real-time X-ray radiography diagnostics of the instantaneous throat variations for deducing the instantaneous erosion rates. The nozzle test section for both motors can also incorporate a nozzle boundary-layer control system (NBLCS) as a means of nozzle erosion mitigation. The effectiveness of the NBLCS at preventing nozzle throat erosion was demonstrated for both the RMS and the ISPM motors at chamber pressures up to 34 MPa (4930 psia). All tests conducted with the NBLCS showed signs of coning of the propellant surface, leading to increased mass burning rate and resultant chamber pressure.;Two correlations were developed for the nozzle erosion rates from solid propellant testing, one for metallized propellant and one for non-metallized propellants. The non-metallized propellant correlation also incorporates the RMS data, accounting for swirling flow of the products in the RMS combustor. These correlations are useful for rocket nozzle designs. The correlation for non-metallized propellant and RMS firings was developed in terms of the effective oxidizer mass fraction and effective Reynolds number. The results calculated from this correlation were compared with measured erosion rate data within +/-15% or 0.05 mm/s (2 mils/s). For metallized propellant, the nozzle erosion rate was found to be relatively independent of the concentration of oxidizing species due to the diffusion-controlled process and the partial surface coverage by the liquid Al/Al2O3 layer. The nozzle erosion rate was also found to be lower than those of non-metallized propellant cases. Agreement between predicted and measured erosion rates was found to be within +/-20% or 0.04 mm/s (2 mils/s).
Keywords/Search Tags:Erosion, Nozzle, Propellant, Rocket, RMS, Motor
Related items