Investigation of chamber methods and a micrometeorological mass balance method for quantifying greenhouse gas emissions from animal manure

Various measurement methods to quantify greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from manure storage or treatment facilities have been used. However, it is difficult to directly compare emission data measured with different methods, which causes uncertainties in national GHG inventories. In the micrometeorological mass balance (MMB) method, a gas flux consists of a horizontal mean flux (MF) and horizontal turbulent flux (TF) terms. In Chapter 2, methane (GH4 ) TF measurements obtained using a sonic anemometer and a tunable diode laser trace gas analyzer are presented. Contrary to previous studies in wind tunnels and flat-level field conditions, an overestimation of only 0.5% was observed by only considering the MF term. This means the MMB method without consideration of TF is suitable in complex field conditions with uneven topography, and farm buildings.; In Chapter 3, the MMB method was compared to a floating chamber method. Of these, the floating chamber method has been extensively used for CH4 flux quantification. The MMB method, although providing advantages such as spatial integration of fluxes, requires fast response trace gas analyzers which are not widely available. The mean ratio of CH4 flux measured with the floating chamber method to that measured using the MMB method was 1.25, ranging from 1.07 to 1.83. Flux overestimation by the floating chamber could have been caused by location of the chamber and potential disturbances by the chamber. Frequent changes of the chamber location, use of several chambers, and/or avoiding chamber placement on 'hot spots' are recommended to decrease flux overestimation.; In Chapter 4, CH4 fluxes measured with a mega chamber and eight small chambers during the in-vessel composting phase showed similar temporal variation, while nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes were, significantly lower for the small chambers. The ratios of CH4 fluxes measured with a mega chamber to eight small chambers during the in-vessel composting phase were 0.72 and 1.01, while the ratios of N2O fluxes were 2.74 and 2.01 during two in-vessel composting batches, respectively. Positioning the small chambers on the center line of the composting channels was suitable for quantifying CH4 fluxes, but was not for N 2O. It is recommended to position some chambers in peripheral regions of the composting channel, in order to capture N2O emissions. Methane and N2O fluxes over the initial 50 d of the curing phase were higher than during the in-vessel composting phase. Methane and N2O emissions during the curing phase contributed 95% and 64%, respectively, to overall CH4 and N2O emissions during the composting process (in-vessel composting phase and curing phase). In comparison to liquid swine manure storage over an equivalent time period, composting was estimated to reduce emissions of GHG on a carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-eq) basis by 35%, which was mainly contributed by a decrease of CH4 emissions. Composting of liquid swine manure with straw has potential for decreasing GHG emissions.