Gender Differences in Adolescent Coping with Peer Victimization Experiences

Studies have shown that youth who are victimized by peers through acts of bullying are at increased risk for psychological maladjustment (Juvonen & Graham, 2001). Researchers have identified ineffective and effective responses to peer victimization associated with psychosocial outcomes. Gender is an important variable in coping research; however, findings to date have been mixed regarding its role. The present study examines the relationship between comprehensive peer victimization and adjustment as mediated by adolescents' endorsed coping strategy. The sample consisted of N = 914 sixth- through eighth-grade students in the Midwestern United States. Participants responded to a questionnaire regarding the frequency of victimization experienced as well as the types of coping they would typically use if a peer victimized them. Participants also reported on their self-esteem (Duboise, 1996) and social anxiety (SAS-A; La Greca & Lopez, 1998). Coping strategies were not found to mediate the relationship between victimization and adolescent adjustment. However, findings suggest that gender differences are present when considering endorsement of coping strategies and adjustment. Positive coping strategies were associated with higher self-esteem and lower social anxiety. Additionally, negative coping strategies were associated with higher levels of social anxiety and lower levels of self-esteem. Implications for future research to further understand gender differences in the peer victimization-adjustment relationship are discussed.