A biblical critique on Bowen's family systems theory of differentiation of self

This dissertation argues that within Bowen's Family Systems Theory (FST), his Differentiation of Self Theory (DST) is contrary to a biblical anthropology at the points of human identity, purpose, and relationships. On the surface, some concepts in DST appear similar to biblical concepts: (1) human beings are natural beings; (2) becoming a differentiated person is one of man's purposes in life; and (3) humans are social beings. However, Scripture and Bowen's theory have differing explanations regarding human nature, the ultimate purpose of man, and human relationships.;Chapter 1 introduces FST as a lens in trying to understand the dynamic relationship process in clergy families and the need to study the theory's evolutionary background; it also scrutinizes FST's assumptions regarding human relationships as compared to Scripture. A biblical critique of FST will lead into implications for parenting and discipleship in clergy families.;Chapter 2 establishes the distinct identity of human beings as the image of God. The concept of humans as created persons refutes Bowen's concept of humans as products of evolution. The Scriptural concept of man as created persons who share the image of God and fully depend on God contradicts the Darwinian concept of FST.;Chapter 3 develops the differences between Bowen's concept and the biblical concept regarding the purpose of man. According to Scripture, the whole purpose of man does not stop in the transient realm of existence; compared with DST, the scriptural concept differs in its focus on man, the creation, or on God, the Creator.;Chapter 4 examines the argument of scriptural differences in Bowen's assumption in regard to human relationships. The Trinitarian concept in Christianity develops a unique pattern in human relationship, which is incomparable to any pattern in any natural relationship.;Chapter 5 summarizes the comparison between the distinct biblical assumptions on identity, purpose, and human relationship, as compared to those in FST. This chapter explores the implications for parenting and discipleship among clergy families based on biblical anthropology rather than FST. It also provides suggestions for further research.