Font Size: a A A

Quantitative Study on Computer Self-Efficacy and Computer Anxiety Differences in Academic Major and Residential Statu

Posted on:2018-06-07Degree:Ph.DType:Dissertation
University:Northcentral UniversityCandidate:Binkley, Zachary Wayne McClellanFull Text:PDF
GTID:1477390020457030Subject:Educational technology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
This study investigates computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety within 61 students across two academic majors, Aviation and Sports and Exercise Science, while investigating the impact residential status, age, and gender has on those two psychological constructs. The purpose of the study is to find if computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety are impacted by academic major, age, gender, and living status. Self-efficacy and anxiety are interconnected and this study uses Bandura's self-efficacy theory to drive the framework. The Computer Self-Efficacy scale and the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS) were used to measure levels of self-efficacy and anxiety as it relates to computer usage and was distributed to the 61 higher education students via an online survey on Google Forms. The results of the study showed that the participants showed a mean CSES score of 116 which is categorized as high computer self-efficacy. The mean CARS score was 54.689 which is labeled as moderate computer anxiety. Students in the Exercise and Movement Science department had higher levels of computer anxiety and lower levels of computer self-efficacy than the Aviation department students. Women had lower levels of computer self-efficacy than males and older students in the study showed higher levels of computer self-efficacy. Residential status did not show a difference in computer anxiety levels or computer self-efficacy levels amongst the students. The results of this study show that computer anxiety is still present in today's learners, regardless of age, gender, residential status, or academic major. Moderate levels of computer anxiety were seen in these students but also high levels of CSE were noticed. In practice, educators must acknowledge that even in situations with high student CSE levels, there still may remain high levels of computer anxiety. Students today are to be considered digital natives, but in learning new technologies, anxiety may still be present even with high levels of self-efficacy on its use. According to this study, anxiety amongst computer use is still present at a moderate level in students and can be impacted by raising CSE through certain pedagogy and strategies.
Keywords/Search Tags:Computer, Academic major, Students, Levels, Residential, CSE
PDF Full Text Request
Related items
The relationship between computer skills and the levels of technostress among faculty and academic librarians from selected institutions within the University System of Georgia
Exploring relationships between thinking style and sex, age, academic major, occupation, and levels of arts engagement among professionals working in museums
Computer self-efficacy: Its relationship to academic major, learning environment, and participation in research-related activities via the Internet
The effects of computer applications on line-graphing skills of tenth grade students having different cognitive developmental levels
'Only connect': A mixed methods study of how first-year students create residential academic and social network
Academic and behavioral characteristics of emotionally disturbed, learning -disabled, and general education students at a secondary residential school
Research On The Influence Between Residential Perception And Attitude Towards Major Sports Events
Analysis of the comparison between the perceptions of adult and traditional major and nonmajor computer science students in computer science classes at the higher education level
The quality of higher education Internet and computer technologies: Exacerbating or lessening differences across countries? An analysis at three levels: National, institutional, and classroom
10 A study of the Millennial Generation regarding information and communication technology literacy levels and comfort levels with digital life environments