A Comparative Study Of Implicit Lexical Usage In The Korean And Chinese

As a part of the cause category,tacit vocabulary makes movement universal across languages,which can not only reflect people's cognitive behavior,but also reflect people's cognitive experience.There are common and unique expressions between different languages,even in the same language.The Chinese vocabulary expression means is rich,the related research is an"old topic" in the grammar research,the research result can be said to be vast,the Korean language form is developed,the vocabulary causes the movement to receive the relatively little attention,the related research is still in the slow development state.From the perspective of linguistic typology,the structure is mainly divided into three types:analytical,morphological and lexical.Therefore,how to bring tacit vocabulary into our vision and carry out cross-language comparative study is a challenging and meaningful work.Tacit vocabulary makes movement exist in all aspects of people's life,which is not only a form of grammatical expression,but also a way of expression of people's verbal communication,so its grammatical research status and verbal communication function can not be ignored.With the joint efforts of scholars at home and abroad,the related research has achieved fruitful results from many angles and levels.However,most of the previous studies have been influenced by the idea of "verb-centered theory ",focusing on the aspects of whether the verb is established or not,the syntactic structure characteristics,the argument semantics and the subject-element operation of the predicate.Therefore,there is still room for further expansion of related research.Based on the study of the former sages,this paper discusses the action of implicit vocabulary in the Korean and Chinese from the perspective of interaction and hierarchy of construction grammar.It mainly focuses on the interaction of syntax,semantics and pragmatics,which includes the following three aspects:the syntactic fusion interaction between predicate and construction;the semantic fusion interaction between predicate role and construction argument;and the fusion interaction between form and semantics.The main findings are as follows:Firstly,the concept and category of tacit lexical motivation are defined from three angles:the combination of form and semantics,the distinction between explicit lexical motivation and implicit lexical motivation,and the difference between other and enabling sentences:There are two causal events in the construction,one is the subject of the event X,the other is the Y,predicate V the connection X and the Y,and the construction does not have the effect on the movement,and the predicate V has a single property.On this basis,based on the formal,semantic and structural integrity,the implicit vocabulary of Korean is divided into four categories:concurrent,dynamic,causative,and imperative.Secondly,this article focuses on the syntactic function level,mainly from the basic framework,expansion,construction on the suppression of predicates,and construction on the tense,adverb and other co-occurrence components of the constraints.In a word,the Chinese word order,as one of the grammatical expressions,promotes the emergence of inverted form,that is,the agent appears in the object position as the object,while the experience appears in the subject position as the subject component.Moreover,the V-R combination of Korean dynamic knot is closer,semantically assign argument,but the form is not separate,and the V-R semantic of Chinese dynamic knot points to cause and result event respectively,which can be separated in form.Furthermore,from the aspect of semantic function,this paper discusses the causative force,the nature of causative semantics and the fusion of predicate semantic roles with causative subject and causative object.In terms of the directness and indirectness of the causative force,the concrete forms of the movement of the Korean and Chinese are different,the former is the direct causative force,and the latter is the secondary directness.As to the fusion mode and process of argument,the causative object of Korean implicit vocabulary is mainly based on the fusion of schema-illustrative relationship,that is,the fusion of subject roles.However,there are also cases in which the role of calendar is fused by metonymy.Finally,based on the pragmatic functional level,this paper makes a comparative analysis of implicit lexical motivation in the Han Dynasty.Mainly from the language economy,prominent and indirect speech acts and other aspects of comparison.From the point of view of salience,the Korean language has the elements of beginning and the middle of the sentence,and the beginning of the sentence is derived from the main body caused by the fusion of non-core semantic roles,while the prominence in the sentence depends on the sentence structure integration of the case auxiliary words.In Chinese,the first component of the sentence and the last component of the sentence are prominent,and the beginning of the sentence is mainly from the main body caused by the fusion of non-core semantic roles,and the end of the sentence is mainly due to the definite middle phrase and the inverted complement with the subordinate relation.As far as the function of verbal communication is concerned,the implicit vocabulary of the Korean and Chinese presents indirect speech act functions such as"expository class","expressive class" and "declarant class",and the command form of Korean language can carry out" command class "direct speech act,that is,direct command or instruction to the hearer through "(?)" and so on.In general,the study of implicit vocabulary movement in the Korean and Chinese highlights the relationship between hierarchy and interaction,and the concrete description and in-depth explanation are unified,which has certain practical value and theoretical significance at different levels.first of all,starting from the construction of the combination of form and semantics,and then to the specific language use,a complete construction chain of "structural events-semantic fusion-pragmatic interaction" is formed,and then a cross-language comparative study is carried out from the perspective of multi-dimensional and multi-domain interaction,which is not only helpful to overcome the shortcomings of form,but also to explore the interactive fusion at different levels.Secondly,the study of tacit lexical motivation based on hierarchy and interaction view is not only beneficial to the practical application of construction grammar theory,but also has positive significance for its development.The specific discussion of implicit vocabulary movement in the Korean and Chinese also provides some information and reference for the construction of systematic and comprehensive structure system.