A Study On The Summary And Theoretical Criticism Of The Ming And Qing Poems In Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu

Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu(hereinafter referred to as the Zong Mu)is divided into five categories: Chu ci,other collections,general collections,poetry review,and lyrics and songs.There are one hundred and forty-nine summaries of the poetry review,which contains abundant contents and ideological information of literary theory criticism.Among them,there are seventy commentaries on Ming and Qing poetry,nearly half of which are rich in content and of great research value.Its summary textual analysis of the author’s life,analysis version information authenticity,evaluation stallion book gain and loss,criticism embodies the essence,conducive to reference.However,there are also omissions and inaccuracies in the version description information,citation,and theoretical criticism in the summary of Ming and Qing poetry reviews,which need to be verified and clarified.Some of the academic criticism also needs further discussion.The summary of the Ming and Qing poetry reviews of Zong Mu has abundant information.The information of the summary version is closely related to Si Ku Quan Shu.When the Qing Dynasty revised Si Ku Quan Shu,it raised the whole country’s efforts to collect books,“this is the great cause of the country”,so the supreme ruler Emperor Qianlong attached great importance to.He also repeatedly in the form of a decree,large and small matters of guidance,considerable care.There were many versions of poetry reviews of the Ming and Qing Dynasties submitted by the provinces,and there were not a few versions of poetry reviews of the Ming and Qing Dynasties that the officials read at that time.The choice was relatively large,and the version had a broad vision.However,on the other hand,the Qing Dynasty revised the Si Ku Quan Shu,collected the Ming and Qing poetry review works both good and bad,gain and loss.Among them,there are not only the contribution of collecting suicide notes and preserving documents,but also the limitation of the selection of the edition is not precise and mixed with fake books.The version narration of the Summary of Ming and Qing poems and articles is based on the evaluation of the relevant poems and articles of Ming and Qing dynasties and provides a lot of valuable version information.However,the “rare books” in the summary of poetry reviews of the Ming and Qing Dynasties are not “good”,the author’s information is wrong,the museum officials misread the preface and the volume statistics are wrong,and so on,which need to be further verified.For example,Zong Mu criticized the Poems of the Past Dynasties,the Poems of the Whole Min Dynasty and the Poems of Tie Li Wen Qi.Zong Mu not only research the author’s information,interpret the content,and comment on the books,but also misunderstand the version information.It is worth noting that the critique of the Ming and Qing poems in Xuehai Category is summarized,involving the discussion of the contents of important editions.This is mainly reflected in two aspects: firstly,the relationship between the same author and different versions of the work is separated into books,mixed up,true and false coexist.Secondly,it is necessary to clean up the authenticity of the edition of poetry review of the Ming and Qing Dynasties in the abstract,so as to restore the truth.The summary of the Ming and Qing poetry reviews of Zong Mu is rich and diverse,with both classics and history subsets.It shows the profound literature literacy,broad literature vision,and “scientific” literature thought.This is mainly reflected in the following aspects: In terms of quantity,there are as many as 224 literatures cited in the summary of poetry and articles of Ming and Qing Dynasties,with an average of more than three for each.from the aspect of quantity,It can be said that the literature citation is not only an integral part of the summary content of poetry review of Ming and Qing Dynasties,but also lays a foundation for theoretical criticism.From the perspective of types,its literature citation includes poetry and literature review,collection,collection,official history and sub-miscellany,etc.After a close reading,we can know that it is mainly composed of poetry and literature review of the Ming and Qing Dynasties,as well as related literature,literature citation is more objective and detailed.On the other hand,it is the obvious feature of its literature citation,which is to worship the real and depose the virtual,and to worship the true and depose the false.It also reflects the literature thought of no evidence,no faith and no evidence.But this does not mean that the bibliography of the Ming and Qing poetry Review is perfect.Through microscopic analysis,it is not difficult to find that there are also errors in the quotation in the summary of poetry reviews of the Ming and Qing Dynasties,which are mainly as follows: errors caused by private amendment of quotations,improper quoting authors,incorrect copying of titles,errors in the quoted content,inconsistent information before and after and mismarking of the sources of literature.These errors mostly belong to the knowledge level and are also related to the literature ideology.Therefore,the combination of literature analysis and ideological discrimination is an effective way to study “General Head”.There are also important theoretical criticisms in the summary of the Ming and Qing poems.In terms of literary criticism,the Zong Mu positions,selects,and comments on the content,connotation,characteristics,and thoughts of poetry criticism works in Ming and Qing Dynasties,reflecting the Zong Mu’s view of poetry criticism in Ming and Qing dynasties.It is mainly realized through such critical methods as the content of poetry criticism,the character of critics,the gain and loss of poetry criticism schools,literary restoration and innovation.The view of poetry criticism in the Ming and Qing Dynasties manifests the official and academic views of the Qing Dynasty and reflects the orthodox and orthodox thoughts.In addition,the Zong Mu also explores the origin of poetic style and literary style.It affirms the critical value of the origin of Tang poetry by saying,“The origin of three hundred years of poetry is changing,and it is possible to follow it.Style,such as trace to the source”,can be traced from the flow to the source.At the same time,the Zong Mu also criticizes those who have “no understanding” of the origin,current and positive change.Therefore,origin exploration reveals the depth of criticism.In the aspect of poetry schools,The Zong Mu is positive to the theoretical criticism of Li Dongyang’s school of poetry,while it mostly demeans,negates and negatively criticizes the Ming Qizi School of poetry,such as “forgeries the ancient”,“copies the ancient”,and “holds too much praise but is not justified”.There is only one “description” of Ming Qizi School poetry and prose criticism and four were“recorded”,which did not accord with their actual status.The Zong Mu describes the“Sheng Yun” school of poetry represented by Wang Shizhen as objective,fair and rational: “Among intimate poems,it is finally the best”,“compared with all poets’ poems,it is always intimate,Sheng Sheng does not announce all bi by one name”,etc.In detail,The content of the literary theory of General Head mainly includes five aspects:first,the official thought is prominent,the pursuit of “public opinion,” the advocation of elegant thought,praise is helpful to “the people of the world.” Balance of thousands of years of right and wrong,the pros and cons of a hundred,for the“eternal yan praise or blame.” Secondly,the Zong Mu criticizes Ming and Qing some poems and articles’ view points,characteristics,and thoughts,striving to be objective and fair.Thirdly,Zong Mu attach importance to examination and differentiation,Seek truth from facts.Fourthly,Zong Mu consciously pay attention to and respond to some important issues in literary criticism.Fifth,the Zong Mu affirms the literature value of the Ming and Qing poetry review works but criticizes the traditional literature,lack of precise knowledge,lack of evidence,and miscellaneous style.Zong Mu is a masterpiece of bibliography and contains a variety of literary criticism thoughts highlights its unique value.The poetry review of Ming and Qing Dynasties has many values,such as literature,criticism and thought,so it has a far-reaching and extensive influence.The value of the poetry review of Ming and Qing Dynasties is mainly reflected in the version,literature,theory and so on.These have great influence on the study of the history of Chinese literary criticism and the history of Chinese poetry.