The trial was carried out to study the effects of different nutrition levels on reproductive performance of crossbred ewes ( Tan ×Small Tail Han). It was designed as randomized experiment of single factor with three levels. Levelâ… , â…¡and â…¢were 0.8×—, 0.9×—and 1.0 ×NRC respectively. The 30 ewes in lamb which were from 1.5 to 2 years old and first or second conceive were chose and divided into three groups consisting of ten ewes each level according to the homogeneous pri-nciple. All ewes were housed in individual pen. But 6 , 5 and 7 ewes were used to the statistical analysis respectively corresponding Levelâ… , â…¡a nd â…¢. Three periods were composed of the late pregnancy period (from 97d to 150d), the lactation length (L.period) (30d) and flush period ( from weaning to the second estrus). The results showed as follows: 1. In the late pregnancy period, LWG of ewes themselves of the level â… , â…¡and â…¢were -4.38±1.91kg, 2.36±2.78kg and 6.12±3.35kg. The total birth weight of lambs of each ewe were 5.73±1.34kg, 5.40±1.65kg and 7.69±2.24kg respectively ( P>0.05), but litter weight of level â…¢was higher than levelâ… and â…¡( P=0.086). The average birth weight of lambs each group were 3.82±0.76kg, 3.86±0.58kg and 4.10±0.77kg respectively ( P>0.05), and the average conceptus were 8.55±1.56kg, 8.20±2.34kg and 9.96±4.61kg respectively ( P>0.05). The DMD, OMD, CPD and ADFD of dietâ…¡were significantly higher than dietâ… ( P<0.01), the OMD and ADFD were higher than diet â…¢(P<0.05,P<0.01) . 2. In the L.period, the average number of lambs nursed by one ewe from each group were 1.75 and 1.40 and 1.70 respectively, total milk yield for 30d was 25.12±4.27kg, 38.43±12.53kg and 52.72±13.50kg respectively, the LWG of the ewes each level were 2.25±3.43kg, -1.45±4.57kg and -1.86±3.89kg ( P>0.05), while LWG of the lambs that each ewe nursed were 6.15±2.62kg, 9.22±2.17kg and 11.90±3.58kg ( level â…¢was significantly higher than levelâ… ) respectively. The weaning weight of the lamb ( kg.per lamd) was 7.71±2.26kg, 10.45±1.72kg and 11.19±2.51kg ( levelâ… was significantly lower than level â…¢(P<0.01)and â…¡(P<0.05)). The DMD and OMD ( P<0.01) and CPD of diet â…¢( P<0.05) were significantly higher than dietâ… , and no significant difference between Levelâ…¡a nd Levelâ… , â…¢was observed ( P>0.05) on the above. No significant difference on ADFD among the three diets was found ( P>0.05). 3. In flush and mating period, the heat cycle of ewes for levelâ… , â…¡and â…¢occurred at 18.60d, 13.25d and 10.71d after weaning when the average LW of three groups ewes were 46.06kg, 46.44kg and 53.71kg, the increment of liveweight compared with that in weaning were 1.35kg, -0.41kg and 2.00kg respectively, the ratio of ewe in estrus were correspond to 83.33%, 80.00% and 100.00%, the fertility rates of ewes were 100%, 100% and 85.71%. After second estrus, ewes of all groups were on massfeeding at 0.9×NRC level. The lambing percentage of levelâ… a nd â…¡were both 200%, while level â…¢was 183.33%. The lambing interval of three Levels were 201.8d, 183.5d and 187.7d respectively, two-lambing-one-year was realized in Levelâ…¡and â…¢. The birth weight of Levelâ… , â…¡and â…¢were 3.34kg, 3.68kg and 3.96kg respectively.
|