Predicament Of Literariness

The depoliticization the movement of Chinese literature in 1980s,which is to alleviateburdens for literature, enables the literature to get rid long in our country the revolution thetime the fate which existed as the tool;Restored the literature candidness, causes the literaturetruly to pay attention to the self sufficient world which the text constructs. This is a liberationmovement of Chinese literature. But this simultaneously indicated that literature withdrewfrom the historical stage. Alleviating burdens for literature finally announced that literature is"useless" to social history. "It doesn't do any longer" confused with "it is not able to do".Moved towards peripherization, literature has become the pure ornament inTelecommunication Science and Technology Time. The "literature end theory" was on the rise"the literature spirit" has already raised. Actually they both referred to a question, namelyliterature decline and "literariness" expansion. Literariness has always been the topic whichChinese theorists focused on. Particularly now, when literature declining dislocated with"literariness" rising, we should reconsider this theoretical term. Certainly, the significance ofusing these terms is lies in using. People also prefer to locate certain terms in the habitualunderstanding. It may avoid the trouble in theory exploring, but is easy to confuse each other.Therefore, it is necessary to comb some important theory terms retroactively. "Literariness" serves as an important theoretical category in the literature and artdiscipline. It participated to discusse the literature essence. It took the ideological trend ofcontemporary West philosophy as the background and established on the basis of the literaturetext research. and linguistics research results of the 20th century initial period. "literariness"was combed in this thesis from its generation to its development and peripherization, inwhich each proposed theory only did description in brief.First, we trace to the source of "literariness" via the cultural archaeology method."Literariness" was proposes officially as a term by Russian formalist Jakobson in 1921. Hethought that "literariness" also enabled a work to be a literary work Russian formalistsunderstood "literariness" from the form linguistics and pay attention to the form and skill of awork. They broke the normal rhythm and the constitution of the literary language;get rid ofthe language "automation", alienated the language form from which people is familiar with."strangelization" was further utilized to literary work. The British and American newcriticists discussed "literariness" from the manifest multi-level, the multi-significance dimcharacteristic of text structure. Structuralists mainly emphasized grasps the literature text inthe overall construction system, which broke the concrete work analysis limitation of theformalism and the new criticism "literariness" They advocated is refers to the poem functionof language mark two style as well as structure pattern which play a crucial role .Baded on the current definition of literariness in our country, first of all, we need to makeclear the literature playground as well as the relationship between literature and literariness,define the concept-literariness again. Then, what is need to do is to draws out the comparisonbetween literariness and the artistry (refers to spatial art particularly). The final aims tounderstand the current literariness through the literature and the image culture relations on thebasis of the human esthetic experience the compatibility.