The Judicial Reform Of Guang Zhou And Wuhan Citizen's Government

This text in owning the foundation of historical datas, such as certain file and newspapers and magazines…etc., and adopt history to learn, sociology and the method historiography especially judicial history learn of research theories(saw from the whole frame structure of thesis, is the theories which learned with the history to study of, but then adopt judicial related theories in regard to concrete problem.)And history analysis, compare to study an etc. method, turn from the judicial party of the angle carries on analysis to study to the citizen's judicial reform of government 1926-1927 years and give to evaluate more and fittingly.The whole textual frame is a heavy background, contents, light process, influence.Chapter 1 thorough analytical this time judicatory reform of background, this part launches from 3, the first, analyze from the late Ching dynasty go to north ocean warlord government period judicatory modern age turn of history background(economy modern age turn with political system of modern age turn) and result(the judicial independent principle usher in) and to Guangzhou the judicial reform of Wuhan citizen's government of influence, this announce to public this time judicatory reform of history origin.The second, establish through detailed Wuhan citizen's government of description Guangzhou of society, legal system condition, especially social condition(include a work agriculture sport of rise and Northern Expedition war of carry on), explained this time judicial reform is be placed in to turn over in the society for a day, the special environment of ground and war appearance descends to carry on.The third, the formation which analyzes "the judicial party turn" through the big change to guide the thought(the new San-min doctrine put forward) to Sun Yat-sen is historical inevitable, its process experienced a few Kuomintangs to leadered.Can see a this time judicatory reform is already a power from above several Be going necessarily, success will come.Chapter 2 detail and profound analysis of this judicial reform and the preparation of the contents of this part from four fronts : first, described in detail before the judicial reform of the preparations, the national government is in the training of judicial personnel, judicial investigations situation, solicit opinions reform three aspects ofreform preparation. Secondly, the adoption of reforms and changes to the judiciary reform has taken note of this examination integration, and collective responsibility to more effective suppression of the enemy. Third, the concept of justice and judicial officers through innovative ideas and guidance on the reform of the different judicial concepts for the new Three People's Principles, the guiding ideology for judicial party. Fourth, this chapter is the most detailed description and analysis of the most profound one subsection, where the author of the civil, penal and procedural law reform of the place, especially in the new system introduced in the Penal Code enacted and promulgated a profound analysis of the causes of these new Criminal Code, the purpose thus derived this reform and the reform of the biggest differences will be reflected everywhere in the interests of the people first and harsh repression village tyrants and bad gentry elements, which are closely linked with the social background.Chapter 3 summarizes the characteristics of this reform, concluded : The greatest feature is the excessive emphasis on the party justice, a justice that ignored the laws of their own development. At the same time, pointed out : both the reform of judicial construction, or the leadership of the Communist Party of Chiang Kai-shek base Nanjing national government judicial building have a profound impact. In short, Guangzhou, Wuhan national government judicial reform in the judicial history of modern China has played a vital role. It dynasty, for judicial reform achievements, the new democratic leadership of the Communist Party of Kai legal system and the Nanjing national government judicial building.