Comparing The Aesthetic In "Script Of Aesthetic Education" With Those In "Economics-Philosophy Manuscript In 1844"

In western classic aesthetic, Schiller's "Script of Aesthetic Education" was regarded as the most centralized and systematic expression of his aesthetic ideas. He changed the knowledge logy-aesthetic into a kind of human ontology-aesthetic. This can be described as the basic aesthetic or philosophical ideas of "Script of Aesthetic Education". It had inspired the Marxism aesthetics theory. and it also became the bridge between classic aesthetic and Marxism aesthetic ideas. All that can be seen clearly in Marx's "Economics-Philosophy Manuscript in 1844". We can say that the aesthetic ideas of "Economics-Philosophy Manuscript in 1844" inherited and transcended " Script of Aesthetic Education" .This paper is based on the philosophical thought of "Script of Aesthetic Education" and "Economics-Philosophy Manuscript in 1844". Firstly, Analysis of the philosophy thought foundation about " Script of Aesthetic Education " is a kind of view of abstract humanism philosophy; both the perception and the rationality are the basic essential factors of human nature constitution. In the integrity human nature, the perception and the rationality should be at the harmonious condition. It is the further development about philosophy of humanism subjectivity. secondly, Analysis the philosophy ontology foundation of "Economics-Philosophy Manuscript in 1844" is human's perception, the objective activity, human's ultimate existence way and human's ultimate value root. It dispelled the traditional metaphysics dual opposition. And it is the new philosophy world outlook establishment.The comparison between two works' aesthetics thought is based on this foundation. In the view of the essence of beauty: Schiller advocated that it equated to the ideal person's essence; Marx did not advocate to look for the essence of beauty purely, and he thought the essence of beauty manifests in human's perceptual objective activity, is unceasingly development. In the view of the production of beauty: Schiller thought the game was the occurrence power of artistic, but it was not the root of beauty in the esthetic embryology; Marx proposed " Working creates beauty " viewpoint, works is the beauty and artistic origin in the esthetic embryology. In the ontology significance, work is the artistic development power. In the view of the realization of beauty: Schiller...