Logical Analysis In David Hume's Dialogues Concernng Natural Religion

The European thought of 18 centuries was an ages that putted brilliance greatly, the natural science developed quickly, science business developed rapidly. Aroused the development of the philosophy immediately, it also brought the philosophers unprecedented confidence. Now that all of natures was the abilities that could depend on people to take into what reasonable explain.So the whole things should be also such things, Europe of 18 centuries was a religion and science again in the conflict coexistence of ages, science progressed unremittingly, the religion stepped back continuously. But the religion thought to occupy an important position still at that time. People still could not get away from a religion. As the philosophers, the religion and faith exists still.But how could persuade it rational accept a religion faith, former can established for God exist of prove, all of these is the problem places. The religious idea that Hume was mainly depended on in his philosophy thought and the logic thought.The researches of the greatly part of religion idea all was existed in to the work of his philosophy and logic research, So studying his religion thought, wanting the work of philosophy thought and the logic thought that would study him to tidy up a thoughts and feelings first. His philosophy thought lied in the foundation that he made sure experience as the whole knowledge, He thought any proof of the credibility and usefulness all had to be accepted an empirical examination, His whole philosophy criticized to criticize and religion to all take this principle as an absolute premise but launch should insist this principle under all circumstances. His religion of judgment at logical main basis in reason logically to the cause and effect a ratio to reason logically in the type of judgment. As for cause and effect reason logically, he thought the detection of the reason and result couldn't pass reasonableness, could pass empirical summary.Analogism logically of the objective foundation was the likeness of the object. From what had already know an object has a certain attribute, releasing another object to also have a this kind attribute, I had ever seen this thing usually have so a follow behind as a result, so I would foresee to another of the superficially alike thing also implied as a result follow behind of the likeness. It was an establishment in future with past likeness, likeness of the property could produce likeness of result,, Its conclusion extended, his ream the person's letter take ground to point out, the conclusion of the every extension can't promise enough anyway its inevitability, but this design argument was that existing to God clear way was a deathblow doubtless.