The Coupling Road Of The Ontology And The Real-life

This paper attempts to discuss the coupling road of the Ontology and the real-life. What"the coupling"want to express is the complex bidirectional function, which can be attributed in principle as a basic mechanism, between the Ontology and the real life. Trying to discuss the relationship between the Ontology and the real life is to reveal the relations of the philosophy and the life, to understand the philosophy itself in relations between person's philosophy and person's real life, thus understands the real life itself.By carding some important thoughts of the Ontology, we could find that, to answer the Ontological questions, there are not the unification answers, nor the unified problem. However, as a part of the philosophy, the Ontology has been lasting and developing unceasingly. It is because that the Ontology has a common intention, that is, attempt to get the ultimate foundation﹑ standard and scale about person's own existence and development. I call this intention the ontological identity and at the same time, call the various answers, which made by this identity intention, ontological historical process change.The process of the ontological identity changing is the process of it's logical progression . But logical progression inevitably roots in people's continue development. It approximates to a self-evident question. By analyzing three elementary sentences,"the philosophy are philosopher's philosophy"﹑"the philosophy are the philosophy researchers' philosophy"﹑"the philosophy are life-rization philosophy by the reality", we could discover that the actual life, being historical process change, surely brings forward the deep question to the Ontology, and these questions need the Ontology to explain or think again. This is the actual life basis behind the ontological logic progression. But the function of the actual life foundation is realized through it's misunderstanding to the Ontology. the consequences produced by misreading can be attributed to the Ontology theory's profound influence to the real life, and it impels person's real life to develop toward the direction of the concept. Simultaneously the real life also makes the serious real life criticism to the ontology theory. The ontology inevitably must summarize again the actual life question which the real life proposed by answering it, and start a new thinking and exploring by returns the question to transcendent theory logic.On the premise of using the same language system, the actual life misunderstands the Ontology. By analyzing Plato's concept of "be", we could discover that the Ontology concept, broken away from fuzziness of daily language concept, has peculiar connotation, and reserves some understanding to daily language's using this concept. It is the basic reason of misreading that the Ontology left. Philosophy language has its own connotation and simultaneously does not the give up day-to-day language intention. Thus the philosophy falling to the life has the natural validity. In fact, this is all philosophy language secret's profound and abstruse principles.To play its role, the philosophy language secret's principles must depend upon the difference between the daily language concept frame and the philosophy language frame. The daily language concept frame's chief feature is empirical and the fuzziness, while the philosophy's is transcendence and determinism. This kind of difference manifests in the concept of daily and the philosophy. In the daily language frame, concept's empirical decides it's object experience. The concept in the daily language concept frame's gets uncertainty in the unceasing experience, it needs some experience system to give it rationalization. This needs the philosophy's birth.In the philosophy concept frame, the concept's resonsideration and transcendence decide the object's inevitability. The concept's resonsideration was the ahead of time resonsideration to concept's connotation and extension changing with the experiences to the daily language concept frame, and has the full self-consciousness. After introspecting, the concept frame's concept itself has intensely inevitability. What the inevitability describes is the concept object's imperfect, but the concept itself obtains the perfect status.The human moves toward the nature unceasingly in the daily language concept frame. In reality activity, human beings break through the concept's boundary unceasingly, and harvest the question in the journey. The human reconsiders unceasingly the nature, the human himself and person's thought in the philosophy concept frame, and also breaks through the concept boundary unceasingly. Thus the human in changing must determine certainly"true". Only then, we can tell us that we are walking on the correct and definite road. The human, regarding natural tiny, always fells fear to the future, and this makes the human fell safe temporarily, in some regularity which may foresee and determine. We must find a basic ultimate principle to support this system. But this ultimate principle is nothing but the initial support of the daily language concept frame, and it definite principle for daily language concept frame's really and credible. The daily language concept frame is person's life, but it's true and credible is the reliable life.So-called true, in the philosophy language, is a logical question, and it has the highest determinism; In the daily language, it is a fact question, and has the relativity, it is to say, in certain level, it maintains true in fact. The establishment of credibility always corresponds with true. In the philosophy language frame, getting the proof of logic true, or achieving"credible", must make the thought logic proof and the thought itself accordable. Therefore in logic true, the credible is to believe firmly that the thought and logic is consistent, accordable and identical. In the daily language frame, as the proof of the fact true, we must acknowledged that in certain existence level, in certain language environment and under the realistic condition, some idea of assurance the existence in the epistemology is real effective.But the question lies in the imperfection of the fact true in daily language frame, and this will directly cause the true of the credible proof oversteps its existence boundary, and enters the philosophy concept frame to seek for the true of the credible proof, which constitutes the credible highest support. What the ontology needs to, or attempts to solve is to determine the life true for the life credible. Thus rises to transcendent logic true to prove the true of change in the actual life. Credible is on existence road, and true does so. In fact true is not in front of credible, but in logic true must in front, this constitutes the entanglement of"true with credible".Thus we could understand the ontology theory's development by three kinds of basic mentalities, they are"the ontology attempts proved by existence","the ontology attempts proved by the thought"and"the ontology attempts proved by relational".The so-called ontology attempts proved by existence is to determine the real existence by grasping the existence's root﹑original basis﹑ attribute﹑composition﹑rule and so on, thus attempts to prove human's behavior of standard. On this principle road, the concept of"the existence"has the intention of"the world","the nature","existential including person"in the daily language.The so-called ontology attempts proved by thought is in the basis of resonsideration to existence proof, the attempts that change the determination of"true"to human's"thought", and attempt to find ultimate standard of"true is true"by"the human's"thought or the generalization of"the human's"thought.The so-called relational proof's ontology is to maintain the concrete understanding to the thought and the existence's relations, and then the boundary of the existence and the thought is established in the reciprocity. Thus the true no longer is already finished goods, but is unceasingly produces in person's historical action. Thus the credible also no longer is one kind of dominant potency quantity, but is person's self-life proof. Theoretically this is realized by Hegel and Marx together.