The Special Study Of Chuci

"LiSao"is called"Jing"by what people and when as a specific began its being called and what is mean and why. Those problem do not absolutely erliable evidence to resolve. Because of the lack of documentation ang literature and iterature described different perspectives throughout history. However,basis of existing litreature,the earliest of"LiSao"asserted and recorded is WangYi's"ChuCiZhangJu"."LiSao"who said that by not a specific time and requirement. This phenomen have a long-standing issues from the earliest documented. We examine this question is still from WangYi's"ChuCiZhangJu". It as our starting point. WangYi's"ChuCiZhangJu"in the"LiSao"asserted. Baise of that phenomenon, some researchers think that"ChuCi"'s Compilation style is existence"Jing""Zhuan"relationship. However, the"Li Sao"is called"Jing"by who and when is still not possible to have reached a consensus. So built on the basis of the"ChuCi"'s compilation style is existence"Jing""Zhuan"relationship is also necessary to re-propose a talk. There is no conclusive evidence to prove that the"ChuCi"'s compilation style is existence"Jing""Zhuan"relationship so far. WangYi's view of"ChuCi" set byLiu Xiang is still the starting point of our investigation."ChuCi"'compilation of style as follows: all non-Qu Yuan's works, both on behalf of Qu Yuan, Li-yan.Talk to the process of"ChuCi",some scholars believe that today the Wang Yi's"ChuCiZhangJu"is not the original appearance."ChuCi"is a book that is a phased process of editing.Liu Xiang is only one of the compilation of the book. Thus,they suspected that Wang Yi's"ChuCi"set by Liu Xiang is reliability.This chapteris to be discrimination the research results of the predecessors.That"ChuCiShiWen"'s order table of contents is a"ChuCiZhangJu"of the original appearance."ChuCi"is in phases by different times by different authors into a book adjunction inferences are not solid evidence to prove can be set up. And accordingly to deduce the"Liu Xiang's editorship,"ChuCi"16 volumes"does not exist.and deny the traditional knowledge of"Wang Yi,"ChuCiZhangJu"Liu Xiang's series"."ChuCi"compilation of style does not reunification .Those views are not convincing. Wang Yi's view of"ChuCi" set by Liu Xiang is still the starting point to for investigation.According to the order denying the"ChuCi"compilation of the unity of style is not to get.ZhuXi added JiaYi's works of DiaoQuYuan and FuNiao to ChuCiJiZhu.At the same time,He Deleted Han's works of QiJian,JiuHuai,JiuTan,JiuSi.It is improper for him to do that.It Chaosed the systemt of ChuCi.WangFuZhi added JiangYan's works of AiYuanShan and ShanZhongChuCi to ChuCiTongShi, and deleted Han'sworks of QiJian, AiShiMing, JiuHuai, JiuTan, JiuSi. And he judged that the theme of ZhaoYinShi is Huainan called the hidden valley people .Those wiews are improper too. ZhuXi and WangFuZhi are caused wrong by the reasons that they were sheltered forculture" and neglected the systemt of ChuCi compiled by LiuXiang. From the development perspective of Bibliography and literature development,the Han works of the"ChuCi" is an important part of this book.It reinforces the subconscious creation of Chu, Qu Yuan's diction, etc. Through the creation of the Han simulation, so that creation of Chu, Qu Yuan and other diction model their effects.If we excluse the Han works of the"ChuCi", the name of the"ChuCi"'s evolution of track will be blurred. These works will not be correctly classified by in the history of Literature.