| The great progress in agriculture and rural economy has been made since the reform and opening to the outside world in China. However, for their further development the traditionally developmental model must be changed and the agricultural industrialization should be developed.The key to the development of agricultural industrialization is to cultivate pilot enterprises that can widen markets, carry through agro-products' deep process, offer services to the farmers and lead the;armers to develop rural production. As an important component the agro-related enterprise plays more and more role in the development of agriculture and rural economy. But, because of the difference of management model and of objects they engaged in, it is difficult to evaluate an enterprise by a single factor. So in order to evaluate enterprise's management level, a set of scientifically and practically systemic evaluation methods must be established, with them to make a comprehensive evaluation and to predict its development future.The author of this paper took 20 agro-related enterprises in Jinzhong City as research objects and made an on-the-spot investigation about their running details in the year 2001 and 2002. Based the data investigated and consulting experts an indicator system with three levels, six aspects and sixteen idiographic indicators were constructed. With the system the author made an evaluation about the running effect of the enterprises. Firstly, the weighted value of every idiographic indicator in this system was established by analytical hierarchy process, and weighted arithmetic average was used to determine the analysis results of the indicators' values of six aspects. Then the principal component analysis were used to calculate the principal component values of twenty enterprises that can be divided into five developmental types according to their principal component values.The five types were as follows: 1) highly developmental level and highly potential type; 2) highly developmental level and lower potential type; 3) highly developmental level and no potential type; 4) low developmental level and highly potential type; 5) low developmental level and no potential type. The analysis results showed that among the twenty enterprises investigated there were seven enterprises belonging to type 1; two, type 2; six, type 3; three, type 4 and two, type 5, respectively.The analysis only from the present developing level showed that there were 15 enterprises belonging to highly developmental level, which accounts for 75% of all investigated enterprises. This percentage also indicated that at the present three fourths of the enterprises run well. But the analysis from developmental potential of the enterprises showed that there were only 50% of all enterprises belonging to highly developmental potential, which showed that the developmental future of half the enterprises was not very good.According to the analysis results different enterprises should take different measures. For the highly potential enterprises the increasing strategy should be taken, and the government shouldpay more attention to their management and support and let them to perform their highest potential and play a leading role to the development of the region's economy. For the lower potential enterprises the steady develop strategy should be taken and promote them gradually to turn forward highly developmental types. And for the enterprises without potential defensive strategy should be taken. They should make industrial structure adjustment gradually and get rid of the passive situation.The research results are of theoretical and practical value to the development of the agro-related enterprises, selection and cultivation of the pilot enterprises as well as the development of agricultural industrialization management. The indicator system used in this study can be expanded in similar regions.
|
PDF Full Text Request