Treatise Of The "Legislation On The Response In The Case Of An Armed Attack" And The Action And The Effect Of It In Japanese Framework Of Defense Policy

In 2003, the Three Laws Regarding Response to Armed Attacks were enacted in Japan. The establishment of " Legislation on the Response in the case of an armed attack ", which has far more meaning than the establishment of " Japan-U.S. Security Arrangements" in 1960, means not only that the strategy of Japanese nation defends is changing greatly, but also the post-war tenet of "Basic Policy for National Defense" in Japan will change completely, and at the same time, the establishment of Japanese Legislation on the war is near to finished. ISince the 90's, the reestablishment of Japanese framework of defense policy caused the changing of the Japanese safe strategy. At the same time, these changes affected the stabilization of the international safe framework in China or even eastern Asia. For knowing the Japanese framework of safe and defense policy, and for China to constitute the foreign policy corresponding to this policy, it is very important to understand what is "Legislation on the Response in the case of an armed attack". However, the study of these problems in our country is not enough, and it is always too late for the development of the decent affairs in Japan.Therefore, using "Legislation on the Response in the case of an armed attack" as the theme, this treatise will discuss "the action and the effect of the 'Legislation on the Response in the case of an armed attack' in Japanese framework of defense policy".Three kinds of analyzing methods were used in this treatise: 1. Unifying method. Unifying the "Legislation on the Response in the case of an armed attack" and Japanese safety strategy to analyze.2. Comparison method. Aiming at the different phases and the different features to analyze. 3. Basing the analysis on the historical facts.There are six chapters in this treatise:Chapter 1 expatiates on the present condition of this study, and the meaning to choose this theme. Chapter 2 analyzes the history of the "Legislation on the Response in the case of an armed attack". Chapter 3 analyzes the internal and the international background of the "Legislation on the Response in the case of an armed attack". Chapter 4 analyzes the content and the structure of the "Legislation on the Response in the case of an armed attack". Chapter 5 analyzes the action and the effect of the "Legislation on the Response in the case of an armed attack" in Japanese framework of new defense policy by expatiating the changes of the Japanese framework of defense policy. Chapter 6 expatiates how the changes affected China and the foreign policy China should constitute to correspond to the Japanese policy.IIThe real signification of the term "Legislation on the Response in the case of an armed attack" is "Legislation on the war".This study began from the 60's of last century. It was studied on papers in 1963. However, for the people's disagreement, the study of "Legislation on the Response in the case of an armed attack" was kept underground. Along with the new development of Japan-U.S. relations in 1979, the study of the "Legislation on the Response in the case of an armed attack" became to be open.The changes of the internal and international situations in the post-cold-war supplied opportunities to the Legislation on the Response in the case of an armed attack and other such emergency. There were also some great changes in the Japanese public's attitude towards the "Legislation on the Response in the case of an armed attack". In 1996, Japan-U.S. Alliance was defined again. All the changes mentioned above caused that the "Legislation on the Response in the case of an armed attack" developed more rapidly.The terrorist attacks in the United States on September 11, 2001, revealed, in the most striking manner, that non-state entities such as terrorists can threat the security of a state. Therefore, Japan wanted to establish the Security Policy, "The Global Challenge of International Terrorism". In order to deny terrorist groups safe havens, s...