Analysis Of Cases Of Sun Zhen And Xing Liangkun's Reward Contract Disputes And Other

The reward in modern society has become a very common phenomenon, but reward hasn't been regulated clearly in china's present law, so there are different opinions about it in theory and legal practice. On the basis of judicial practice, this paper through comprehensive use of case analysis method, scientific analytical method, comparative method and method of interest evaluation, on three classic case of a commercial dispute fully explore and study and found on the basis of a blind spot of law and to identify the law difficult in practice, find a reasonable solution to the legislative recommendations. Article consists of three parts.The first part, explained, "Sun Zhen and Xing Liangkun's reward contract dispute" case, "reward-hyde" case and "find package notice" case, the basic facts of the case and a brief description of each case, leads to reward a problem in practice.The second part, for the first part of the legal issues, a comprehensive analysis of the first part of the legal issues. Such as:the concept and reward elements; about the nature of reward, "says unilateral acts" and "contract" the advantages and disadvantages, I believe that a more reasonable contract and the analysis shows that the reasons; with three cases on the legal characteristics of reward in-depth analysis.The third part, with case proceedings at issue in the present analysis of the reward and "brag" banter (the game) means that the bet andlost things and differences between systems.The fourth part, combined with the preceding three typical cases of in-depth analysis of such cases to reward perfect legal problems to make some legislative proposals:the legal nature of certain advertising contracts reward based on the views put forward their own sound; certain contract said; reward the effective elements of advertising and time to remove the problem, pay issues need further clarification.