| Expert conclusion is an important form of our country's criminal evidence. DNA identification, as one kind of expert conclusion, is very helpful in locking suspects, searching nameless bodies and stringing cases.It has characteristics of scientific nature, the particularity of identifier and written form, subjectivity and conclusion only involved technical problems. From the basic principle of DNA identification view, it is scientific and objective, but the identifier is subjective, only can be assigned or hired by public security and judicial organs. If lack of normalized operation, DNA identification will lose evidence effect. Therefore, we should pay special attention to the neutrality of identifiers and norms of procedures.Countless false case has tells us: if you can't treat DNA identification correctly, too superstitious with scientific evidence will inevitably increase the risk of poor decisions. So it's necessary to review it. We can review the DNA identification from the content and program. On the one hand, we should review the evidence's authenticity, relevance and legitimacy; On the other hand, we should establish and perfect the corresponding legal norms to ensure the correct use of scientific evidence. Cross-examination, identifier testified and expert auxiliary system would be more efficient and accurate for reading expert conclusion. |