Study Of Crimination For Moral Obligation Breaches

There　are　arguments　regarding　legislation　for　moral　obligations　in　the　frame　of　criminal　law.　While　the　criminal　law　is　the　strictest　law　which　regulates　and　constrains　the　behavior　of　individuals,　a　slight　adjustment　of　criminal　codes　will　have　significant　effects　on　the　society.　Therefore,　before　any　new　conducts　are　brought　up　to　be　regulated　by　the　Criminal　Law,　the　feasibility　should　be　cautiously　demonstrated　both　theoretically　and　practically.　Otherwise,　an　arbitrary　introduction　of　criminal　article　will　have　inestimable　negative　influence　on　individuals,　and　impair　the　stabilization　and　healthy　development　of　the　society.　　Before　composing　this　article,　a　survey　targeting　this　argument　was　designed　and　data　were　collected　and　studied.　On　the　premise　of　decentralizing　sample　diversity,　best　effort　was　done　by　the　author　to　accomplish　the　investigation(　Please　check　the　appendix　for　details).　If　the　survey　questionnaire　was　designed　in　a　more　efficient　way　and　more　samples　were　collected,　the　feedback　information　would　have　been　much　clearer　and　would　have　offered　a　more　scientific　result.　However,　some　critical　issues　were　suggested　in　the　feedback　and　reasonable　conclusions　were　made　through　the　analysis　of　feedback　results.　　In　this　essay,　the　controversial　subject,　whether"　Looking　on　Unconcerned　to　Others'　Danger"　(LOUTOD)　should　be　defined　as　a　crime,　is　studied　as　an　example　of　legislation　for　moral　obligations.　In　order　to　fully　examine　the　feasibility　of　enabling　"LOUTOD"　in　China,　the　case　has　been　looked　at　carefully　from　the　angles　of　ethnical,　as　well　as　jurisprudence,criminal　jurisprudence　and　Comparative　Law.　　　Besides,　the　most　important　contribution　of　this　work　is　the　introduction　of　"Twice　Lawbreaking"　(TL)　theory.　Simply,　if　a　behavior　doesn't　have　TL　characteristics,　meaning　if　a　behavior　just　violates　the　general　law　(Once　Lawbreaking)　or　if　it　never　violates　any　law,　according　to　"TL"　theory　this　behavior　should　not　be　brought　into　the　range　of　criminal　law.　Only　if　the　behavior　has　developed　"Once　Lawbreaking"　and　its　extent　of　harm　is　beyond　the　scope　of　general　laws,　then　it　can　be　brought　into　the　criminal　area,　and　becomes　the　object　of　the　criminal　law　regulations.　　With　this　theory,　I　am　hoping　to　introduce　a　new　way　to　discuss　the　issue　of　LOUTOD　and　to　state　my　opinion　and　reach　a　conclusion.　More　generally,　my　objective　is　to　introduce　a　new　way　to　study　such　similar　issues　regarding　Crimination　of　Moral　Obligations　breaching.　　　In　conclusion,　the　question　of　whether　"looking　on　unconcerned　to　others'　danger"　should　be　defined　as　crime　is　decided　by　the　concrete　conditions.　We　should　distinguish　different　situations　while　judging　LOUTOD.　If　it　has　constituted　criminal　omission,　then　it　should　be　regulated　by　corresponding　criminal　article.　If　not,　then　it　should　only　be　restrained　by　moral　obligation　or　the　general　laws　outside　criminal　law.　The　suggested　law　article　"Looking　on　Unconcerned　to　Others'　Danger"　should　not　be　set　up　in　China　today.　I　highly　suggest　being　cautious　to　such　kind　of　Crimination　for　Moral　Obligations.