Private Remedy In Civil Enforcement

Based　on　a　field　study　of　an　informal　debt-collection　practice,　the　　　dissertation　explores　private　remedy,　judicial　remedy　and　dispute　settlement　　　mechanisms,　and　puts　forward　some　significant　proposals　for　judicial　　　reform　and　rule　of　law.　The　dissertation　insists　on　methodological　pluralism,and　tries　to　bridge　the　gap　between　civil　procedure　and　social　science.　Furthermore,　it　develops　a　perspective　of　"micro-narrative　and　macro-field",by　focusing　on　China's　own　issues,advocating　interdisciplinary　research,　from　origin　to　field,　from　particulars　to　generalizations,　from　specific　cases　to　theories,　from　a　mono-thread　to　multi-perspectives,　from　litigation　to　jurisprudence,　then　ideology,　to　society.　The　dissertation　comprises　three　parts,Introduction,Text　and　Final　Chapter.The　Text　consists　of　three　chapter.　The　Introduction　expands　the　reality　and　deep　value,the　apparent　angle　and　the　central　idea.　The　first　chapter　of　the　text　briefly　describes　the　actuality　of　civil　enforcement　in　our　country,　and　analyzes　the　reasons　for　the　difficulty　of　civil　enforcement,including　three　main　factors----the　parties,　People's　Courts　and　society.　Furthermore,　it　remarks　on　the　measures　which　have　been　taken　recently　by　People's　Courts　in　order　to　solve　the　difficulty　of　civil　enforcement.　In　the　second　chapter　of　the　text,in　view　of　jurisprudence　this　article　discusses　the　part　of　private　remedy　in　the　relief　theory.First　of　all　it　defines　private　remedy　,　generalizes　its　essential　components　and　analyzes　its　value.　Then　it　comes　to　the　point　that　the　most　important　value　of　private　remedy　is　for　justice,efficiency　and　social　order.　Finally,it　discusses　the　interplay　among　private　remedy,　judicial　remedy　and　social　remedy.　　　　　The　third　chapter　of　the　text　describes,　modern　　private　remedy　　in　civil　enforcement,as　the　supplement　for　judicial　remedy,consists　of　two　forms,including　self-help　and　informal　debt-collection,is　the　production　of　the　development　of　human　society.Under　the　situation,which　judicial　remedy　had　abtained　superiority　of　social　relief,it　is　reasonable　that　private　remedy　exists　in　some　limits,and　also　it　has　great　value　for　social　justice,order　and　benefits.In　the　practice　of　Chinese　rule　by　law,on　account　of　some　historical　and　realistic　reasons,there　are　some　disorderly　phenomenas　in　private　remedy　and　we　ought　to　take　some　measures　to　stardardize　them　and　try　to　achieve　social　control　on　private　remedy　through　law.　In　the　final　chapter,　I　call　on　to　take　private　remedy　seriously,　make　it　function　positively,　limit　and　channel　its　negative　functions,　and　construct　a　multiple　dispute　settlement　mechanism　under　which　judicial　remedy,　private　remedy　and　social　remedy　interplay　conducively.