The Analyzing And Research To The Case On Rearrangement Of Assetsin HongGuang Industry Corporation

With the development of world economic integration and informationization, the rearrangement of assets has become an important way to collocate the social resources. All countries consider the scramble to the leading place in world political and economy, they guide the rearrangement of enterprises positively, interfere it directly and promote it effectively. The speed of development to the Chinese economy attracts the attention of whole world, but the task to the economic restructuring is still very heavily for us. So, to adjust the economy structure, promote the transition of the style of economic increase and improve the quality of whole national economy and the economic benefits of enterprises become the focus of our economic work. The article according to the investigation and research, and make analyze and research to the background, process, result and the relative policy of rearrangement assets in Hong Guang. HongGuang established in 1958, was the one of the important items (there are 156 items) by the help construction of the Soviet Union in the First Five. It played an important role in the national defense construction and the development of social economy. However, with economic system reform of our country constantly and the development of marketing economy, on the draggling mind of staff, the enterprise management and policy make HongGuang withdrew the market gradually. Its development and decline reflects the development and reform process of Chinese economy. There are history reasons, system reasons and reasons from itself conduced to its bankrupt. Although most of people imputed the bankrupt to the history and system reasons, the author thought that the decisions made by its own and the management regulations are the main reasons from the microcosmic analyze. The two enterprises, Ancai Group and Guangdong Fortune, which participle the rearrangement according to the need of its own development and competition, they took the burden to save the national enterprise. For them the cha 李留恩nges are bigger than opportunities in this rearrangement. But it didn't work with the plan because the reason of the changing market. In this process of rearrangement, government played the leading role and became the biggest buyer. The banks also paid larger cost in this process. So we can look from the rearrangement result and the development that it is successfully. This article has positive reference meanings to both the rearrangement in enterprises and the government that joins in the enterprises reform.