The Personal Free-judgment, as the basic system and principle of criminal action, is a bridge which connects the facts that prosecutors and advocates maintain with the adjudicative facts that judges maintain. The research on the Personal Free-judgment not only has theoretical significance, it has instructive significance in practice as well. The article discusses the Personal Free-judgment is an outcome of rational litigation and acceptable judgment. And expatiates on its objective tendency emphatically.The author's train of thought, which analyses the evidence systems survey appeared in history aecording to the textual research and analyses on the evidence appraisable system in history. As has been discussed above, the author gets the general idea, that is, the contemporary Personal Free-judgment is based on modern litigant principles, theories and evidential principles theories. Ant its rationality is supported by a series of guaranteed systems. So the Personal Free-judgment is the best system which is adopted to discover truth and to restrain subjectivity to the full extent.
|