Research On Aggregated Consequential Liability In Joint Crime

In judicial practice, joint crimes often occur. But in the implementation process, one or more peoples'acts directly caused more serious consequences, and then the criminal law prescribes a statutory punishment, which is a heavier sentence than the basic crime. In such circumstances, as far as the criminals who conduct the serious consequences are concerned, they naturally the aggregate consequential offence, and shoulder the aggregated consequential liability. But for other people who are the accomplices, how to define their responsibilities? The author attempts to explore the aggregated consequential liability in the joint crime, with reference to the traditional way of researching on the criminal patterns, expecting to give a clear conceptual framework, and solve problems in practice.This paper is divided into four parts to discuss the central problem except for the foreword and conclusion:The first part is devoted to solving the basic problems of aggregated consequential liability in the joint crime, prescribing and describing it from both theory and practice, and illustrates the significance of the study. In the first place, through the discussion on one case, showing those in face of such cases, judges can only use the basic academic analysis or their personal evaluations to evaluate and estimate for the lack of legal prescriptions. Different judges often have opposite verdicts to similar cases, which seriously damage the judicial practice. Then, it stipulates the problems that aggregated consequential liability is intended to solve in joint crime, studying the following specific ideas.