| This thesis consists of three parts: Introduction, Main body and Conclusion.The introduction starts from 2 cases from which the writer abstracts several questions on judicial expertise, then the writer expresses her reason why she has chosen this topic. The main body has four parts.The first part is about the concept of judicial expertise. Through the comparison and analysis of the two legal families, and the introduction of the ideas of judicial expertise concept in our country, the writer concluded the importance and the shorts of the judicial expertise concept. On this base, the writer gave out some advice on defining judicial expertise concept.In the second chapter, firstly, the status of legislation and the judicial expertise practice were talked about. Words about some problems existing in our judicial expertise system take a good place of this part. They are : no range and time limit, the improper establishment of the organization, the imperfection of the system of experts presenting in the courts, the inequality to launch the judicial expertise proceedings, etc.In the third chapter, the writer compared and analyzed the judicial expertise rule of the two legal families on the base of brief introductions on their status. After that, the writer concluded the advantages and disadvantages of the two legal families and discussed the developing trend of them. Lastly, think of the status of our country, the writer gets some merits that can be useful for our country.The last part is the most important one in this article. In this part, the writer conceived some ideals on vision and rule about how to make our ongoing judicial expertise system much better. Ideals on visions included vision of governing by law, vision of equality, vision of human rights. Ideals on rule included innovation of judicial expertise organization, innovation of launching judicial expertise proceedings and how to point the most scientific judicial expertise conclusion when there are many of them, etc.
|
PDF Full Text Request