Font Size: a A A

Comparative Analysis Of The "No Interruption Revolution" Theory And The Related "Left" Theory In The Same Period

Posted on:2011-05-07Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Z H ZhuoFull Text:PDF
GTID:2166360305471042Subject:Marxist theory
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
After the failure of the Great Revolution, the China's revolutionary strategy which was made by Communist International and the United Communist Party (Bolshevik) was failed. Under the guidance of the Communist International and the United Communist Party (Bolshevik), the revolutionary policy of the CPC Central Committee changed "Left" of the beginning the Agrarian Revolutionary War from "Right" of the Great Revolution post. The "Left" error doctrine of the CPC Central Committee for the first time formed under the direct guidance of the Communist International and the United Communist Party (Bolshevik). Stalin's "three-stage" theory and Lominadze's "No interruption revolution" theory were as the representatives of the theory of the Chinese revolution which were made by the Communist International and the United Communist Party (Bolshevik) in this period. The previous studies mainly focused on Stalin's "three-stage" theory, a Comparative Study of Stalin's "three-stage" theory, Lominadze's " No interruption revolution " theory and the CPC for the first time the "Left" is still significant enough. This article attempts a comparative study about the three theories based on the re-characterization of the Chinese revolution after the "4.12" and "7.15" counter-revolutionary coup.In this article, a comparative study of methods is mainly used. It grasps the general theory that the Communist International and the United Communist Party (Bolshevik) guided the Chinese revolution at the beginning of the Agrarian Revolutionary War. The comparative analysis is made from these theories, the main errors, the same points, different points and the background and causes of these theories. It's a better way to clarify the relationship between them. Stalin put forward a theory that the Chinese revolution was divided into three stages based on the re-characterization of the Chinese revolution after the "4.12" and "7.15" counter-revolutionary coup. Lominadze was as the Embassy representatives of the Communist International in China, on the basis of a combination that he put on the "three-stage" theory of understanding and the reality of the Chinese revolution, he created a " No interruption revolution " theory.The " No interruption revolution " theory was the inheritance and development of the "three-stage" theory. At the same time it with the "three-stage" theory played a significant role in guiding the Chinese communists to form the first "Left" mistakes. These three theories are interrelated and mutually distinct. They reflected different understanding of the Chinese revolution by the Communist International, Union Communist Party (Bolshevik) and CCP.In order to restore the historical truth more comprehensive and more objective,the author has been using a large number of data and results of recent studies about the relationship between the Communist International and the United Communist Party (Bolshevik) with China's revolution. The author made some deeper level of study and exploration that based on the other research about the relationship between the Communist International and the United Communist Party (Bolshevik) with China's revolution.
Keywords/Search Tags:"No interruption revolution" Theory, "Three-stage" Theory, The first "Left" Theory, Comparative Analysis
PDF Full Text Request
Related items