The Analysis Of Element And Complete Quality Of Chinese Athletes On The Ninth Aerobic Gymnastics World Championships

The Chinese team has got great achievement on the ninth Aerobic Gymnastics World Championships, which is not only the first largest competition by the new rules, but also an important turn in the course of our aerobic gymnastics. The FIG rule consulted on 2005 highlighted the proportion of difficulty score in the final score, on these grounds, systematic analysis and research on this championship will contribute to the development of China's aerobic gymnastics. The research is based on the actions did by the athletes that have won the top three in Individual men,Individual women, Mixed pair,Trio and Groups during the 9th Aerobic Gymnastics World Championships. The main methods which we used in this paper are literature information, expert interview, contrast analysis and kinescope statistics. Based on the FIG rule ,we try to make a comparative analysis with advanced countries in element and it's complete quality through to the 9th World Aerobics Championship Competition China's various projects.We try to objectively, correctly, comprehensively expounde the advantages and disadvantages between China's competitive aerobics and the world's advanced countries in element's group, the number, type, scheduled and execution quality , so as to facilitate identify gaps, reversing disadvantage, promote our advantages to enhance China's Competitive Aerobics technical level.Research results:I.There is no obvious discrepancy between Chinese individual men item and other national athletes in element categories. The overall arrangement in element presented well- balanced attribute, displayed by high quality execution. It means difficulty arrangement of routine and synthetical quality of our individual men is in the lead, which will make Chinese team dominant position for a period II.It remains obvious gap in individual women item between our team and champion group: Chinese athlete merely got 3.25 points, 0.45 points less than champion athlete, due to the non-balanced element category and low quality execution; our team grasped the key in element linking score, obtaining additional 0.2 points; the element arrangement in routine took no advantage.III.There is obvious discrepancy between Chinese mixed pair and championship team in element categories, as a result of low quality execution and low scoring of selected difficulty of our athlete, while selected element categories and overall arrangement is well-balanced.IV.Our Trio is no inferior to champion teams'in execution score and element score. However, the disparity of artistic score points out we should enhance artistry in routine. Chinese Trio has leaded in front rank, competing golden medal with traditional powerful nations.V.Our Groups select comparatively reasonable element categories'values, while the accomplishment still have great place for promotion; in selection element categories, the men athletes select less balance and flexible movements, which proves low in flexible quality; Space possession and categories distributed reasonably , but compared to other countries no obvious advantages.