A Study Of Western Dialogue Criticism

Dialogic Criticism is modeled on the theory and critical procedures of the Sovlet criticMikhail Bakhtin, it is full of unique theoretical tension and style characteristic. AlthoughDialogic Criticism is not form his own criticism genre like New Criticism and feminist criticism,it is instructiveness in the post-modern context. Dialogic Criticism provided platform for all ofthe the critics who are all looking forwards to equal conversation in the field of literature critismto realize criticism communication. So the syudy of Dialogic Criticism will also be of positivesignificance and great value. This paper is divided into five parts:The first part introduces the multiple bases of Dialogic Criticism theory. This chaptermainly discusses the foundation of Dialogic Criticism theory from philosophy、literature andaesthetics. First, the paper analyzes the times background of western philosophical turn andbriefly introduces Dialogic Criticism mislinguistic veer showed in the literature.Second,inspectfrom the western view of literature and Criticism Perspective,and points out thatdialogue criticism is a historic task itself development of western literary criticism.Third,analyzes the influence of Bakhtin’s dialogue theory.The second part introduce the characteristics of dialogue criticism theory. This chapter fromthe three aspects of the theoretical characteristics of dialogue criticism. First is thecomplementary character, dialogue participants emphasized that the views of all parties coexistand complement each other. Second is the open character, discusses the criticism of criticismoriented open all participants. Third is the unfinished character, discusses the dialogue criticismis a continuous process, will never end.The third part introduce the practice form of Dialogic Criticism.This chapter mainlydiscusses four forms of the dialogue criticism: the dialogue between the Critics and works, thedialogue between the critics and critics, the dialogue between the critics and readers, thedialogue between the critics and authors,And points out that only by the Dialogic Criticism, cancritics reflect each other’s different thought and produce more reasonable, approach truth moreclosely.The fourth part mainly discusses the realization condition and principle of DialogicCriticism. First is the dialogue criticism of conditions, from two aspects of internal and externalconditions to realize the dialogue criticism discusses conditions. Second is the principle ofpractice the dialogue criticism, discusses the dialogue criticism of the principle of equality andthe principle of subjectivity, openness rules and build rules and the present Rules of truth..The fifth part is the conclusion. In the conclusion part, discusses the future prospects of criticism and criticism of the dialogue, points out that dialogue criticism is a literary criticism tothe future and an ideal literary criticism. Also pointed out that to ensure the universality and thepermanent inter subjective dialogue relations is very difficult.